東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Student use of Web 2.0 tools to supp...

Weible, Jennifer L.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Student use of Web 2.0 tools to support argumentation in a high school science classroom.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Student use of Web 2.0 tools to support argumentation in a high school science classroom./
Author:	Weible, Jennifer L.
Description:	245 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-07A(E).
Subject:	Educational technology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3690175
ISBN:	9781321578461

Student use of Web 2.0 tools to support argumentation in a high school science classroom.
Weible, Jennifer L.

Student use of Web 2.0 tools to support argumentation in a high school science classroom. - 245 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Pennsylvania State University, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This ethnographic study is an investigation into how two classes of chemistry students (n=35) from a low-income high school with a one-to-one laptop initiative used Web 2.0 tools to support participation in the science practice of argumentation (i.e., sensemaking, articulating understandings, and persuading an audience) during a unit on alternative energy. The science curriculum utilized the Technology-Enhanced Inquiry Tools for Science Education as a pedagogical framework (Kim, Hannafin, & Bryan, 2007). Video recordings of the classroom work, small group discussions, and focus group interviews, documents, screen shots, wiki evidence, and student produced multi-media artifacts were the data analyzed for this study. Open and focused coding techniques, counts of social tags and wiki moves, and interpretive analyses were used to find patterns in the data. The study found that the tools of social bookmarking, wiki, and persuasive multimedia artifacts supported participation in argumentation. In addition, students utilized the affordances of the technologies in multiple ways to communicate, collaborate, manage the work of others, and efficiently complete their science project. This study also found that technologically enhanced science curriculum can bridge students' everyday and scientific understandings of making meaning, articulating understandings, and persuading others of their point of view. As a result, implications from this work include a set of design principles for science inquiry learning that utilize technology. This study suggests new consideration of analytical methodology that blends wiki data analytics and video data. It also suggests that utilizing technology as a bridging strategy serves two roles within classrooms: (a) deepening students' understanding of alternative energy science content and (b) supporting students as they learn to participate in the practices of argumentation.

ISBN: 9781321578461Subjects--Topical Terms:

517670
Educational technology.

Student use of Web 2.0 tools to support argumentation in a high school science classroom.
LDR:02945nmm a2200313 4500 001 2062304
005 20151021090418.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321578461
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3690175
035 $a AAI3690175
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Weible, Jennifer L. $3 3176677
245 1 0 $a Student use of Web 2.0 tools to support argumentation in a high school science classroom.
300 $a 245 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Heather Toomey Zimmerman.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Pennsylvania State University, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This ethnographic study is an investigation into how two classes of chemistry students (n=35) from a low-income high school with a one-to-one laptop initiative used Web 2.0 tools to support participation in the science practice of argumentation (i.e., sensemaking, articulating understandings, and persuading an audience) during a unit on alternative energy. The science curriculum utilized the Technology-Enhanced Inquiry Tools for Science Education as a pedagogical framework (Kim, Hannafin, & Bryan, 2007). Video recordings of the classroom work, small group discussions, and focus group interviews, documents, screen shots, wiki evidence, and student produced multi-media artifacts were the data analyzed for this study. Open and focused coding techniques, counts of social tags and wiki moves, and interpretive analyses were used to find patterns in the data. The study found that the tools of social bookmarking, wiki, and persuasive multimedia artifacts supported participation in argumentation. In addition, students utilized the affordances of the technologies in multiple ways to communicate, collaborate, manage the work of others, and efficiently complete their science project. This study also found that technologically enhanced science curriculum can bridge students' everyday and scientific understandings of making meaning, articulating understandings, and persuading others of their point of view. As a result, implications from this work include a set of design principles for science inquiry learning that utilize technology. This study suggests new consideration of analytical methodology that blends wiki data analytics and video data. It also suggests that utilizing technology as a bridging strategy serves two roles within classrooms: (a) deepening students' understanding of alternative energy science content and (b) supporting students as they learn to participate in the practices of argumentation.
590 $a School code: 0176.
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Science education. $3 521340
650 4 $a Instructional design. $3 3172279
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0714
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a The Pennsylvania State University. $3 699896
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-07A(E).
790 $a 0176
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3690175