東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Twice Challenged: Distinguishing Eng...

Roen, Lisa.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Twice Challenged: Distinguishing English Language Acquisition from Learning Disabilities.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Twice Challenged: Distinguishing English Language Acquisition from Learning Disabilities./
作者:	Roen, Lisa.
面頁冊數:	245 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-10A(E).
標題:	Special education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3663333
ISBN:	9781321870855

Twice Challenged: Distinguishing English Language Acquisition from Learning Disabilities.
Roen, Lisa.

Twice Challenged: Distinguishing English Language Acquisition from Learning Disabilities. - 245 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of St. Thomas (Minnesota), 2015.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

An action research study of practices used to nominate English Learners (ELs) for special education services was conducted to examine the disproportionate representation of ELs in special education. The experiences of district administrators and teaching staff were examined to identify existing practices used to nominate and identify ELs for English language services. Findings revealed ELs were referred to special education due in part to linguistic and cultural differences. Teachers developed deficit-oriented frameworks, nominating ELs students for special education at higher rates. Child study teams concentrated on qualifying students for special education. Once identified for special education, ELs received services using a pullout model (involving concentrated language supports outside of the general education class). The pullout model limited the potential to ELs for academic success. An analysis conducted through the theoretical lens of critical pedagogy uncovered organizational frameworks necessary for improving EL achievement, solving academic problems, and adequately considering linguistic and cultural factors when considering referrals to special education. Specifically, frameworks promoting inclusive English language services, collaboration across professional assignments, opportunities for teachers to engage in critical reflection, and increased capacity to provide early intervention within the general education setting. Finally, this study offers a systematic method for addressing ELs presenting with persistent academic problems to account for linguistic and cultural differences without assuming the presence of a disability. The study offers a decision making model to differentiate between the challenges associated with English language acquisition and learning disabilities.

ISBN: 9781321870855Subjects--Topical Terms:

516693
Special education.

Twice Challenged: Distinguishing English Language Acquisition from Learning Disabilities.
LDR:02888nmm a2200313 4500 001 2062126
005 20151020081559.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321870855
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3663333
035 $a AAI3663333
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Roen, Lisa. $3 3176480
245 1 0 $a Twice Challenged: Distinguishing English Language Acquisition from Learning Disabilities.
300 $a 245 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Sarah J. Noonan.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of St. Thomas (Minnesota), 2015.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a An action research study of practices used to nominate English Learners (ELs) for special education services was conducted to examine the disproportionate representation of ELs in special education. The experiences of district administrators and teaching staff were examined to identify existing practices used to nominate and identify ELs for English language services. Findings revealed ELs were referred to special education due in part to linguistic and cultural differences. Teachers developed deficit-oriented frameworks, nominating ELs students for special education at higher rates. Child study teams concentrated on qualifying students for special education. Once identified for special education, ELs received services using a pullout model (involving concentrated language supports outside of the general education class). The pullout model limited the potential to ELs for academic success. An analysis conducted through the theoretical lens of critical pedagogy uncovered organizational frameworks necessary for improving EL achievement, solving academic problems, and adequately considering linguistic and cultural factors when considering referrals to special education. Specifically, frameworks promoting inclusive English language services, collaboration across professional assignments, opportunities for teachers to engage in critical reflection, and increased capacity to provide early intervention within the general education setting. Finally, this study offers a systematic method for addressing ELs presenting with persistent academic problems to account for linguistic and cultural differences without assuming the presence of a disability. The study offers a decision making model to differentiate between the challenges associated with English language acquisition and learning disabilities.
590 $a School code: 1064.
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
650 4 $a Bilingual education. $3 2122778
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
690 $a 0529
690 $a 0282
690 $a 0525
710 2 $a University of St. Thomas (Minnesota). $3 1021989
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-10A(E).
790 $a 1064
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3663333