東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

When Does Compatibility Interference...

Wiediger, Matthew D.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

When Does Compatibility Interference Occur for Reaching Responses? An Investigation of Cognitive and Automatic Visuomotor Control.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	When Does Compatibility Interference Occur for Reaching Responses? An Investigation of Cognitive and Automatic Visuomotor Control./
作者:	Wiediger, Matthew D.
面頁冊數:	66 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-06, Section: B, page: 3751.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-06B.
標題:	Cognitive psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3452355
ISBN:	9781124586601

When Does Compatibility Interference Occur for Reaching Responses? An Investigation of Cognitive and Automatic Visuomotor Control.
Wiediger, Matthew D.

When Does Compatibility Interference Occur for Reaching Responses? An Investigation of Cognitive and Automatic Visuomotor Control. - 66 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-06, Section: B, page: 3751.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Washington State University, 2010.

Withholding an action plan in memory for later execution can delay execution of another action if the actions share a similar (compatible) action feature (i.e., response hand). Wiediger and Fournier (2008) found this phenomenon, termed compatibility interference, for reaching responses based on stimulus detection to a stimulus location at 17° with the left hand, but not the right hand. The current study investigated whether this result was due to hemispheric differences in the cognitive control of visually-guided responses or whether differences in the cognitive control of action based on hand preference. A sample of left and right hand preferring participants planned and withheld a sequence of keypress responses (with their right or left hand), according to the identity of a stimulus (Stimulus A), and then immediately executed a visually guided action (touch response) to a second stimulus (Stimulus B) at 15°, 35°, and 54° to the left and right of the body midline based on its location. In contrast to Wiediger and Fournier, CI was not found for responses at 15° and instead a facilitation of compatible responses was found for responses at 35° and 54° for left hand preferring participants and at 54° for right hand preferring participants. These results suggest that the reach response in the current study did not rely on short-term memory to select the appropriate response and was facilitated by compatible response plans held in memory when the reaching response was directed to more lateral stimulus locations.

ISBN: 9781124586601Subjects--Topical Terms:

523881
Cognitive psychology.

When Does Compatibility Interference Occur for Reaching Responses? An Investigation of Cognitive and Automatic Visuomotor Control.
LDR:02498nmm a2200277 4500 001 2060481
005 20150828095240.5
008 170521s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124586601
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3452355
035 $a AAI3452355
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Wiediger, Matthew D. $3 3174642
245 1 0 $a When Does Compatibility Interference Occur for Reaching Responses? An Investigation of Cognitive and Automatic Visuomotor Control.
300 $a 66 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-06, Section: B, page: 3751.
500 $a Adviser: Lisa Fournier.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Washington State University, 2010.
520 $a Withholding an action plan in memory for later execution can delay execution of another action if the actions share a similar (compatible) action feature (i.e., response hand). Wiediger and Fournier (2008) found this phenomenon, termed compatibility interference, for reaching responses based on stimulus detection to a stimulus location at 17° with the left hand, but not the right hand. The current study investigated whether this result was due to hemispheric differences in the cognitive control of visually-guided responses or whether differences in the cognitive control of action based on hand preference. A sample of left and right hand preferring participants planned and withheld a sequence of keypress responses (with their right or left hand), according to the identity of a stimulus (Stimulus A), and then immediately executed a visually guided action (touch response) to a second stimulus (Stimulus B) at 15°, 35°, and 54° to the left and right of the body midline based on its location. In contrast to Wiediger and Fournier, CI was not found for responses at 15° and instead a facilitation of compatible responses was found for responses at 35° and 54° for left hand preferring participants and at 54° for right hand preferring participants. These results suggest that the reach response in the current study did not rely on short-term memory to select the appropriate response and was facilitated by compatible response plans held in memory when the reaching response was directed to more lateral stimulus locations.
590 $a School code: 0251.
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 2144733
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0623
710 2 $a Washington State University. $3 678588
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-06B.
790 $a 0251
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3452355