東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Reading comprehension assessment: A ...

Stephens, Emily A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Reading comprehension assessment: A comparison of academic and clinical measures.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Reading comprehension assessment: A comparison of academic and clinical measures./
作者:	Stephens, Emily A.
面頁冊數:	54 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 53-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International53-03(E).
標題:	Educational tests & measurements. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1560007
ISBN:	9781321010664

Reading comprehension assessment: A comparison of academic and clinical measures.
Stephens, Emily A.

Reading comprehension assessment: A comparison of academic and clinical measures. - 54 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 53-03.

Thesis (M.S.)--The University of North Dakota, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) test is a computer-based academic assessment of reading comprehension that is used by school districts nationwide. The MAP has established reliability, but its validity is not widely available. The purpose of this study was to seek validity for the MAP by comparing it to the Gray Oral Reading Test---5th edition (GORT-5), a frequently used and valid clinical test of reading comprehension. Participants included twenty-eight fourth grade students ranging from 9;7 to 10;8 years of age, with a mean of 10;2. Each participant completed the GORT-5 and MAP test. The GORT-5 and MAP each yield two reading scores: one that exclusively measures reading comprehension and another that offers an overall score of reading ability, which considers skills such as vocabulary, phonological awareness, reading speed, etc. Results indicated a fair-to-moderate correlation (r=.39) between comprehension scores, and a strong correlation (r=.65) between overall scores of reading. Several theories are discussed as to why the comprehension scores were not strongly correlated.

ISBN: 9781321010664Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168483
Educational tests & measurements.

Reading comprehension assessment: A comparison of academic and clinical measures.
LDR:02048nmm a2200301 4500 001 2059227
005 20150728123720.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321010664
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1560007
035 $a AAI1560007
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Stephens, Emily A. $3 3173268
245 1 0 $a Reading comprehension assessment: A comparison of academic and clinical measures.
300 $a 54 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 53-03.
500 $a Adviser: Sarah Robinson.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--The University of North Dakota, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) test is a computer-based academic assessment of reading comprehension that is used by school districts nationwide. The MAP has established reliability, but its validity is not widely available. The purpose of this study was to seek validity for the MAP by comparing it to the Gray Oral Reading Test---5th edition (GORT-5), a frequently used and valid clinical test of reading comprehension. Participants included twenty-eight fourth grade students ranging from 9;7 to 10;8 years of age, with a mean of 10;2. Each participant completed the GORT-5 and MAP test. The GORT-5 and MAP each yield two reading scores: one that exclusively measures reading comprehension and another that offers an overall score of reading ability, which considers skills such as vocabulary, phonological awareness, reading speed, etc. Results indicated a fair-to-moderate correlation (r=.39) between comprehension scores, and a strong correlation (r=.65) between overall scores of reading. Several theories are discussed as to why the comprehension scores were not strongly correlated.
590 $a School code: 0156.
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0535
690 $a 0710
710 2 $a The University of North Dakota. $b Speech-Language Pathology. $3 3173269
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 53-03(E).
790 $a 0156
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1560007