東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Anthropogenic ecological impacts of ...

Harte, Marybeth.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Anthropogenic ecological impacts of 17th and 18th century Chickasaw through a study of faunal remains.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Anthropogenic ecological impacts of 17th and 18th century Chickasaw through a study of faunal remains./
Author:	Harte, Marybeth.
Description:	97 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-06.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International52-06(E).
Subject:	Anthropology, Archaeology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1556394
ISBN:	9781303916793

Anthropogenic ecological impacts of 17th and 18th century Chickasaw through a study of faunal remains.
Harte, Marybeth.

Anthropogenic ecological impacts of 17th and 18th century Chickasaw through a study of faunal remains. - 97 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-06.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of South Carolina, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

A diachronic analysis of five faunal assemblages from Chickasaw sites is carried out to evaluate their anthropogenic ecological impacts during the colonial time period (A.D. 1650-1750). Change in faunal exploitation, diversity measures and disturbance taxa frequencies are analyzed to gauge these impacts. A comparison with late Mississippian period faunal use provides a benchmark to examine how shifts in the cultural system initiated new ecological impacts. Results from the faunal analysis are also compared with reports of faunal utilization and landscape management practices in the historical record. These reports provide a basis for assessing change in prey preferences according to the social context of the colonial era which demonstrates that change in faunal utilization can be attributed to the implementation of a new social order. The presented evidence is used to further the goals of historical ecology and confront the ecologically noble savage slot by showing the Chickasaw impacted their environment in a multitude of ways and did so in a strategic effort that best contributed to their survival.

ISBN: 9781303916793Subjects--Topical Terms:

622985
Anthropology, Archaeology.

Anthropogenic ecological impacts of 17th and 18th century Chickasaw through a study of faunal remains.
LDR:02042nmm a2200277 4500 001 2057463
005 20150610075022.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303916793
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1556394
035 $a AAI1556394
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Harte, Marybeth. $3 3171309
245 1 0 $a Anthropogenic ecological impacts of 17th and 18th century Chickasaw through a study of faunal remains.
300 $a 97 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-06.
500 $a Adviser: Charles R. Cobb.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of South Carolina, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a A diachronic analysis of five faunal assemblages from Chickasaw sites is carried out to evaluate their anthropogenic ecological impacts during the colonial time period (A.D. 1650-1750). Change in faunal exploitation, diversity measures and disturbance taxa frequencies are analyzed to gauge these impacts. A comparison with late Mississippian period faunal use provides a benchmark to examine how shifts in the cultural system initiated new ecological impacts. Results from the faunal analysis are also compared with reports of faunal utilization and landscape management practices in the historical record. These reports provide a basis for assessing change in prey preferences according to the social context of the colonial era which demonstrates that change in faunal utilization can be attributed to the implementation of a new social order. The presented evidence is used to further the goals of historical ecology and confront the ecologically noble savage slot by showing the Chickasaw impacted their environment in a multitude of ways and did so in a strategic effort that best contributed to their survival.
590 $a School code: 0202.
650 4 $a Anthropology, Archaeology. $3 622985
690 $a 0324
710 2 $a University of South Carolina. $b Anthropology. $3 1669510
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 52-06(E).
790 $a 0202
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1556394