東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Re-imagining the law of dispute reso...

Piva, Maxim.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Re-imagining the law of dispute resolution: An analysis of the democratic potential of Alternative Dispute Resolution and mediation based upon the theoretical frameworks of Jacques Ranciere and Hannah Arendt.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Re-imagining the law of dispute resolution: An analysis of the democratic potential of Alternative Dispute Resolution and mediation based upon the theoretical frameworks of Jacques Ranciere and Hannah Arendt./
Author:	Piva, Maxim.
Description:	137 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International54-02(E).
Subject:	Alternative Dispute Resolution. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1571109
ISBN:	9781321407013

Re-imagining the law of dispute resolution: An analysis of the democratic potential of Alternative Dispute Resolution and mediation based upon the theoretical frameworks of Jacques Ranciere and Hannah Arendt.
Piva, Maxim.

Re-imagining the law of dispute resolution: An analysis of the democratic potential of Alternative Dispute Resolution and mediation based upon the theoretical frameworks of Jacques Ranciere and Hannah Arendt. - 137 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-02.

Thesis (M.A.)--Trent University (Canada), 2015.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This project examines the development and deployment of mediation frameworks in Canada with the goal of advocating for the restoration of dispute resolution as the site of democratic politics. In doing so we enlist the work of Petyr Kropotkin's theory of Mutual Aid and a brief history of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Canada to identify procedural differences in mediation processes that separate interest mediation, rights mediation and litigation. We then turn to two separate analyses of these differences. The first utilizes the theoretical framework of Jacques Ranciere. The second examines the work of Hannah Arendt. Despite the significant differences in their approaches, the work of Ranciere and Arendt, in admittedly different ways, show that interest mediation holds the greatest potential for approaching dispute resolution as an exercise in democratic politics. As a result the project advocates for the expansion or further empowerment of interest mediation as a way of securing and ensuring the continued development of Canada as a democratic community.

ISBN: 9781321407013Subjects--Topical Terms:

1674098
Alternative Dispute Resolution.

Re-imagining the law of dispute resolution: An analysis of the democratic potential of Alternative Dispute Resolution and mediation based upon the theoretical frameworks of Jacques Ranciere and Hannah Arendt.
LDR:02246nmm a2200325 4500 001 2057200
005 20150610073817.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321407013
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1571109
035 $a AAI1571109
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Piva, Maxim. $3 3171019
245 1 0 $a Re-imagining the law of dispute resolution: An analysis of the democratic potential of Alternative Dispute Resolution and mediation based upon the theoretical frameworks of Jacques Ranciere and Hannah Arendt.
300 $a 137 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-02.
500 $a Adviser: Feyzi Baban.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Trent University (Canada), 2015.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a This project examines the development and deployment of mediation frameworks in Canada with the goal of advocating for the restoration of dispute resolution as the site of democratic politics. In doing so we enlist the work of Petyr Kropotkin's theory of Mutual Aid and a brief history of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Canada to identify procedural differences in mediation processes that separate interest mediation, rights mediation and litigation. We then turn to two separate analyses of these differences. The first utilizes the theoretical framework of Jacques Ranciere. The second examines the work of Hannah Arendt. Despite the significant differences in their approaches, the work of Ranciere and Arendt, in admittedly different ways, show that interest mediation holds the greatest potential for approaching dispute resolution as an exercise in democratic politics. As a result the project advocates for the expansion or further empowerment of interest mediation as a way of securing and ensuring the continued development of Canada as a democratic community.
590 $a School code: 0513.
650 4 $a Alternative Dispute Resolution. $3 1674098
650 4 $a Political Science, Public Administration. $3 1017438
650 4 $a Canadian Studies. $3 1020605
650 4 $a Sociology, Industrial and Labor Relations. $3 1017858
690 $a 0649
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0385
690 $a 0629
710 2 $a Trent University (Canada). $b Theory, Culture and Politics. $3 3171020
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 54-02(E).
790 $a 0513
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1571109