東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Design and Evaluation of a Decision ...

Money, Evelyn T.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Design and Evaluation of a Decision Aid to Help Accounting Students at a Mid-Atlantic College Make Ethical Decisions.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Design and Evaluation of a Decision Aid to Help Accounting Students at a Mid-Atlantic College Make Ethical Decisions./
Author:	Money, Evelyn T.
Description:	202 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-02A(E).
Subject:	Business Administration, Accounting. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3599542
ISBN:	9781303489167

Design and Evaluation of a Decision Aid to Help Accounting Students at a Mid-Atlantic College Make Ethical Decisions.
Money, Evelyn T.

Design and Evaluation of a Decision Aid to Help Accounting Students at a Mid-Atlantic College Make Ethical Decisions. - 202 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (D.B.A.)--Wilmington University (Delaware), 2013.

The purpose of this study was to design and test a decision aid that could be used to improve ethics education, raise self-serving bias awareness, and improve the deliberative reasoning of accounting students. The decision aid was administered using a 2x2 experimental design with two levels of decision aid use and two levels of ethics instruction to 118 accounting students in conjunction with the Accounting Ethical Dilemma Instrument. While students perceived that the decision aid was helpful in reducing bias, there were no significant differences between the deliberative reasoning scores of students who used the decision aid and those who did not. Although answers to open-ended questions demonstrated that students considered ethical principles when making ethical decisions, there was no association between deliberative reasoning scores and ethics instruction. The most significant finding was that the students were pre-conventional in deliberative moral reasoning (primarily considering benefits to themselves and close associates) in considering what they would have done in the accounting-specific scenarios. The decision aid might have been more effective in improving prescriptive moral reasoning (what should be done) rather than deliberative reasoning (what would you do). Recommendations are made for improving decision aid design and ethics instruction.

ISBN: 9781303489167Subjects--Topical Terms:

1020666
Business Administration, Accounting.

Design and Evaluation of a Decision Aid to Help Accounting Students at a Mid-Atlantic College Make Ethical Decisions.
LDR:02320nam a2200289 4500 001 1969042
005 20141219110821.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303489167
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3599542
035 $a AAI3599542
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Money, Evelyn T. $3 2106298
245 1 0 $a Design and Evaluation of a Decision Aid to Help Accounting Students at a Mid-Atlantic College Make Ethical Decisions.
300 $a 202 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Ruth T. Norman.
502 $a Thesis (D.B.A.)--Wilmington University (Delaware), 2013.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to design and test a decision aid that could be used to improve ethics education, raise self-serving bias awareness, and improve the deliberative reasoning of accounting students. The decision aid was administered using a 2x2 experimental design with two levels of decision aid use and two levels of ethics instruction to 118 accounting students in conjunction with the Accounting Ethical Dilemma Instrument. While students perceived that the decision aid was helpful in reducing bias, there were no significant differences between the deliberative reasoning scores of students who used the decision aid and those who did not. Although answers to open-ended questions demonstrated that students considered ethical principles when making ethical decisions, there was no association between deliberative reasoning scores and ethics instruction. The most significant finding was that the students were pre-conventional in deliberative moral reasoning (primarily considering benefits to themselves and close associates) in considering what they would have done in the accounting-specific scenarios. The decision aid might have been more effective in improving prescriptive moral reasoning (what should be done) rather than deliberative reasoning (what would you do). Recommendations are made for improving decision aid design and ethics instruction.
590 $a School code: 1517.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Accounting. $3 1020666
650 4 $a Education, Business. $3 1017515
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 517264
690 $a 0272
690 $a 0688
690 $a 0394
710 2 $a Wilmington University (Delaware). $b College of Business. $3 2092481
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-02A(E).
790 $a 1517
791 $a D.B.A.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3599542