東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Knowing heaven: Astronomy, the calen...

Morgan, Daniel Patrick.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Knowing heaven: Astronomy, the calendar, and the sagecraft of science in early imperial China.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Knowing heaven: Astronomy, the calendar, and the sagecraft of science in early imperial China./
Author:	Morgan, Daniel Patrick.
Description:	414 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-04A(E).
Subject:	Asian Studies. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3606338
ISBN:	9781303634598

Knowing heaven: Astronomy, the calendar, and the sagecraft of science in early imperial China.
Morgan, Daniel Patrick.

Knowing heaven: Astronomy, the calendar, and the sagecraft of science in early imperial China. - 414 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2013.

This dissertation is a series of textual case studies on nontraditional sources for li[special characters omitted]"calendro-astronomy" circa 250 BCE - 250 CE: (1) the silk manuscript guide to military planetary astronomy/astrology Wuxing zhan[special chracters omitted] (168 BCE), (2) excavated calendars and state li manuals, and (3) the Jin shu's [special characters omitted] record of the debate surrounding a failed attempt at li reform in 226 CE. This selection affords us a number of unique cross sections through the astral sciences. Balancing transmitted with excavated sources, I emphasize realia and their perspective on era technical knowledge, the formats in which it was produced and consumed, and its transmission and practice beyond an elite court-centered context. In addition to the three elements of li--calendrics, eclipses, and planetary astronomy--my selection draws together the broad array of astral sciences, exploring distinctions in genre, sociology, and epistemology between, for example, mathematical astronomy, hemerology, and omenology, and the (tortuous) processes by which knowledge moved between them. Each chapter also juxtaposes the normative descriptions of manual literature with products of practice---tables, calendars, and test results---to reflect upon the distance between them and, thus, the limitations of the former as historical testimony. Across these cross sections, my study focuses on the question of empiricism and progress. I foreground these topics not because they define twentieth-century notions of science but because, as I argue, they define early imperial notions of li---a point that our twenty-first-century aversion to positivism and Whig history tends to obscure. To this end, I catalog the conceptual vocabulary of observation and testing, submit empirical practices to mathematical and sociological analysis, and, most importantly, explore the formation and function of legend---the histories of science that early imperial actors wrote and recounted in their own day.

ISBN: 9781303634598Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669375
Asian Studies.

Knowing heaven: Astronomy, the calendar, and the sagecraft of science in early imperial China.
LDR:04406nam a2200289 4500 001 1968446
005 20141210112833.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303634598
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3606338
035 $a AAI3606338
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Morgan, Daniel Patrick. $3 2105608
245 1 0 $a Knowing heaven: Astronomy, the calendar, and the sagecraft of science in early imperial China.
300 $a 414 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Donald Harper.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2013.
520 $a This dissertation is a series of textual case studies on nontraditional sources for li[special characters omitted]"calendro-astronomy" circa 250 BCE - 250 CE: (1) the silk manuscript guide to military planetary astronomy/astrology Wuxing zhan[special chracters omitted] (168 BCE), (2) excavated calendars and state li manuals, and (3) the Jin shu's [special characters omitted] record of the debate surrounding a failed attempt at li reform in 226 CE. This selection affords us a number of unique cross sections through the astral sciences. Balancing transmitted with excavated sources, I emphasize realia and their perspective on era technical knowledge, the formats in which it was produced and consumed, and its transmission and practice beyond an elite court-centered context. In addition to the three elements of li--calendrics, eclipses, and planetary astronomy--my selection draws together the broad array of astral sciences, exploring distinctions in genre, sociology, and epistemology between, for example, mathematical astronomy, hemerology, and omenology, and the (tortuous) processes by which knowledge moved between them. Each chapter also juxtaposes the normative descriptions of manual literature with products of practice---tables, calendars, and test results---to reflect upon the distance between them and, thus, the limitations of the former as historical testimony. Across these cross sections, my study focuses on the question of empiricism and progress. I foreground these topics not because they define twentieth-century notions of science but because, as I argue, they define early imperial notions of li---a point that our twenty-first-century aversion to positivism and Whig history tends to obscure. To this end, I catalog the conceptual vocabulary of observation and testing, submit empirical practices to mathematical and sociological analysis, and, most importantly, explore the formation and function of legend---the histories of science that early imperial actors wrote and recounted in their own day.
520 $a As it stands, the dissertation has four body chapters. Chapter 1 provides a history and sociology of the astral sciences in the Han, covering the sources, legend, and conceptual vocabulary of li, the history of Han li from the perspective of both ideas and institutional reforms, and a survey of participants' backgrounds, motivations, education, and epistemological contentions. Chapter 2 examines how the Wuxing zhan manuscript segregates and conflates distinct genres of planetary models, then sketches the subsequent history of these genres, showing how, despite seemingly opposite orientations to reality, actors gradually rewrote and reassessed (crude) hemerology-based omenological (tianwen[special characters omitted]) models through the lens of progress made in mathematical (li) ones. Chapter 3 explores a similar gulf that opened between astronomy and calendrics in this period, as well as the gulf between imperial ideology---within which the calendar was the premier symbol of cosmo-ritual dominion---and the actualities of the production, distribution, and use of calendars in a manuscript culture. Lastly, chapter 4 analyzes the two epistemic strategies at the center of (the Jin shu's take on) the circa 226 CE court debate on li: the quantitative determination of "tightness" (accuracy) of lunisolar and planetary models through competitive testing, and the contestation of claims through the deployment of precedence from the history of the field.
590 $a School code: 0330.
650 4 $a Asian Studies. $3 1669375
650 4 $a History of Science. $3 896972
690 $a 0342
690 $a 0585
710 2 $a The University of Chicago. $b East Asian Languages and Civilizations. $3 1677532
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-04A(E).
790 $a 0330
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3606338