東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Influence of aural and visual expres...

Sasanfar, Justine Karmel.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Influence of aural and visual expressivity of the accompanist on audience perception of expressivity in collaborative performances of a soloist and pianist.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Influence of aural and visual expressivity of the accompanist on audience perception of expressivity in collaborative performances of a soloist and pianist./
Author:	Sasanfar, Justine Karmel.
Description:	135 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-02A(E).
Subject:	Music. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3539619
ISBN:	9781267640321

Influence of aural and visual expressivity of the accompanist on audience perception of expressivity in collaborative performances of a soloist and pianist.
Sasanfar, Justine Karmel.

Influence of aural and visual expressivity of the accompanist on audience perception of expressivity in collaborative performances of a soloist and pianist. - 135 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2012.

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of accompanist expressivity, both aural and visual, on perception of overall expressivity in collaborative performances of a soloist and pianist. Research questions for the present study were: (1) Are there differences in perceived expressivity between performances with aurally expressive and aurally unexpressive piano accompaniment? (2) Are there differences in perceived expressivity between performances with visually expressive and visually unexpressive piano accompaniment? (3) Are there differences in perceived expressivity between the background areas of participants (music major with keyboard background, music majors with non-keyboard background, non-music majors)?

ISBN: 9781267640321Subjects--Topical Terms:

516178
Music.

Influence of aural and visual expressivity of the accompanist on audience perception of expressivity in collaborative performances of a soloist and pianist.
LDR:04672nam a2200313 4500 001 1968130
005 20141203121100.5
008 150210s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267640321
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3539619
035 $a AAI3539619
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Sasanfar, Justine Karmel. $3 2105250
245 1 0 $a Influence of aural and visual expressivity of the accompanist on audience perception of expressivity in collaborative performances of a soloist and pianist.
300 $a 135 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: John M. Geringer; Victoria McArthur.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2012.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of accompanist expressivity, both aural and visual, on perception of overall expressivity in collaborative performances of a soloist and pianist. Research questions for the present study were: (1) Are there differences in perceived expressivity between performances with aurally expressive and aurally unexpressive piano accompaniment? (2) Are there differences in perceived expressivity between performances with visually expressive and visually unexpressive piano accompaniment? (3) Are there differences in perceived expressivity between the background areas of participants (music major with keyboard background, music majors with non-keyboard background, non-music majors)?
520 $a Audio-visual performances were created of two soloists, a vocalist and cellist, performing musical excerpts with a piano accompanist who played either aurally expressive or unexpressive, and appeared either visually expressive or unexpressive. The soloists maintained a stylistically appropriate level of expressivity throughout. The aural and visual accompanist conditions were combined to create congruent and incongruent versions, resulting in 16 experimental stimuli. Three groups of participants (music majors with keyboard backgrounds, music majors with non-keyboard backgrounds, and non-music majors) rated the overall expressivity of each collaborative performance using an 11-point rating scale. Listener attention was purposefully not directed toward the accompanist or soloist, but instead toward the collaborative performance of both contributors. Participants (N = 72) also completed a survey that addressed perception of accompanist expressivity in collaborative performance, both in general and in reference to the research task.
520 $a Statistical analysis showed significant differences for both the aural and visual expressivity of the accompanist (p < .01). Performances with aurally expressive accompaniment were rated higher than those with aurally unexpressive accompaniment across both visual conditions. Likewise, performances with visually expressive accompaniment were rated higher than those with visually unexpressive accompaniment across both aural conditions. There were differences between the groups of participants according to background. Ratings of participants with music major backgrounds (keyboard and non-keyboard) were similar, while those of the non-music majors were found to be significantly different from the responses of music majors with keyboard backgrounds. There were also differences between participants with regard to the influence of accompanist aural and visual expressivity. Participants of all backgrounds perceived the contrast in the accompanist's presentation of the two visual conditions. However, while non-music majors' responses were similar between the aural expressivity conditions, ratings of both groups of music majors differed by more than two rating scale points between the expressive and unexpressive aural conditions.
520 $a Survey responses indicated that participants based expressivity judgments on a variety of factors, including specific musical elements, degree of physical movement, and whether or not they perceived collaboration between performers. More than half of the participants reported that they divided their attention equally between the soloist and pianist. Participants also indicated that in collaborative performance, the musical expressivity of the soloist was regarded as more important than any other rated factor (which included soloist physical expressivity, pianist musical expressivity, and pianist physical expressivity).
590 $a School code: 0071.
650 4 $a Music. $3 516178
650 4 $a Performing Arts. $3 896022
690 $a 0413
690 $a 0641
710 2 $a The Florida State University. $b Music. $3 2093296
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-02A(E).
790 $a 0071
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2012
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3539619