東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

American and Australian Doctoral Lit...

Green, Rosemary.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

American and Australian Doctoral Literature Reviewing Practices and Pedagogies.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	American and Australian Doctoral Literature Reviewing Practices and Pedagogies./
Author:	Green, Rosemary.
Description:	271 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-10, Section: A, page: 3634.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-10A.
Subject:	Education, Higher. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3468159
ISBN:	9781124811154

American and Australian Doctoral Literature Reviewing Practices and Pedagogies.
Green, Rosemary.

American and Australian Doctoral Literature Reviewing Practices and Pedagogies. - 271 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-10, Section: A, page: 3634.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Deakin University (Australia), 2009.

The literature review is fundamental to the doctoral enterprise of academic disciplines, yet research into how the doctoral literature review is learned, taught or experienced is limited. Responding to an apparent under-examination of the literature review as a critical feature of doctoral learning, this thesis investigates the doctoral literature review process as experienced by American and Australian doctoral candidates, doctoral supervisors and academic librarians. The research followed a qualitative approach shaped by two questions: "How is the doctoral literature review process learned?" and, "What is learned by doing a doctoral literature review?" Data were generated from in-depth interviews conducted with 42 participants in education, nursing and the physical and biological sciences. Critical literacy, critical pedagogy and critical information literacy provided frameworks for interpreting participants' experiences and perspectives on literature reviewing practices, disciplinary influences and mutually associated doctoral literacies.

ISBN: 9781124811154Subjects--Topical Terms:

543175
Education, Higher.

American and Australian Doctoral Literature Reviewing Practices and Pedagogies.
LDR:03801nam a2200325 4500 001 1967725
005 20141124124224.5
008 150210s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124811154
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3468159
035 $a AAI3468159
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Green, Rosemary. $3 2104787
245 1 0 $a American and Australian Doctoral Literature Reviewing Practices and Pedagogies.
300 $a 271 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-10, Section: A, page: 3634.
500 $a Adviser: Peter Macauley.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Deakin University (Australia), 2009.
520 $a The literature review is fundamental to the doctoral enterprise of academic disciplines, yet research into how the doctoral literature review is learned, taught or experienced is limited. Responding to an apparent under-examination of the literature review as a critical feature of doctoral learning, this thesis investigates the doctoral literature review process as experienced by American and Australian doctoral candidates, doctoral supervisors and academic librarians. The research followed a qualitative approach shaped by two questions: "How is the doctoral literature review process learned?" and, "What is learned by doing a doctoral literature review?" Data were generated from in-depth interviews conducted with 42 participants in education, nursing and the physical and biological sciences. Critical literacy, critical pedagogy and critical information literacy provided frameworks for interpreting participants' experiences and perspectives on literature reviewing practices, disciplinary influences and mutually associated doctoral literacies.
520 $a The doctoral literature review is traditionally considered to be two segregated events---literature seeking and writing in an academic genre. The study findings challenge this perspective, proposing instead that doctoral literature reviewing is a complex, comprehensive process characterised by interdependent activities in a cycle of gathering, reflecting upon and synthesising literatures. Moreover, these findings indicate that, by engaging with disciplinary literatures and the literature review process, doctoral researchers become familiar with an array of critical doctoral literacies---disciplinary literacy, information literacy and reading and writing literacies. Thus, the doctoral literature review can be conceptualised as a pedagogy through which candidates acquire the lived practices and craft skills of disciplinary-specific research; learn to manage large bodies of information, literature and knowledge; and learn to read and write as scholars in their disciplines.
520 $a This project reconceptualises traditional perspectives on doctoral literature reviewing and recommends further exploration into its pedagogical potential. By approaching the doctoral literature review as a pedagogical process, the inquiry attempts to unpack literacies embedded within the doctoral enterprise, thereby exposing them as explicit aspects of doctoral learning. Becoming aware of the interrelatedness of critical doctoral literacies can mobilise supervisors, librarians and candidates to exploit the literature review process more fully. Ultimately, this research contributes to an international focus on a central feature of the doctorate and, as such, more broadly informs and supports doctoral pedagogy, particularly for those involved in American and Australian doctoral education.
590 $a School code: 1649.
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Education, Pedagogy. $3 1669025
650 4 $a Library Science. $3 881164
650 4 $a Information Science. $3 1017528
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0456
690 $a 0399
690 $a 0723
710 2 $a Deakin University (Australia). $3 2104788
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-10A.
790 $a 1649
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2009
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3468159