東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Advocating for social justice throug...

Gardiner, Sarah M.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Advocating for social justice through a decision-making process to select a service delivery model that better meets the needs of English language learners.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Advocating for social justice through a decision-making process to select a service delivery model that better meets the needs of English language learners./
Author:	Gardiner, Sarah M.
Description:	155 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-05(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-05A(E).
Subject:	Education, Leadership. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3611266
ISBN:	9781303717970

Advocating for social justice through a decision-making process to select a service delivery model that better meets the needs of English language learners.
Gardiner, Sarah M.

Advocating for social justice through a decision-making process to select a service delivery model that better meets the needs of English language learners. - 155 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-05(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Washington State University, 2013.

This study is a design-based research study, grounded in advocacy action research that investigates the change process. The researcher led a leadership team as they explored services to best meet the needs of English language learners in a highly diverse school district. Its purpose was to promote social justice through a decision-making process and select an optimal service delivery model for all students, especially English language learners, and to further clarify and develop a district-wide decision-making model for large-scale decision making.

ISBN: 9781303717970Subjects--Topical Terms:

1035576
Education, Leadership.

Advocating for social justice through a decision-making process to select a service delivery model that better meets the needs of English language learners.
LDR:02889nam a2200313 4500 001 1966246
005 20141106122641.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303717970
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3611266
035 $a AAI3611266
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Gardiner, Sarah M. $3 2103047
245 1 0 $a Advocating for social justice through a decision-making process to select a service delivery model that better meets the needs of English language learners.
300 $a 155 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-05(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Michele Acker-Hocevar.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Washington State University, 2013.
520 $a This study is a design-based research study, grounded in advocacy action research that investigates the change process. The researcher led a leadership team as they explored services to best meet the needs of English language learners in a highly diverse school district. Its purpose was to promote social justice through a decision-making process and select an optimal service delivery model for all students, especially English language learners, and to further clarify and develop a district-wide decision-making model for large-scale decision making.
520 $a The leadership team consisted of five key participants. Kurt Lewin's unfreezing and changing phases served as the lens for leading the participants through researching services and programming for English language learners. The leadership team also reflected on their experiences throughout the process.
520 $a Themes emerged under each stage of Lewin's change theory, which explored participant's processes that led to the successful completion of the unfreezing and changing phase. Under unfreezing two themes were identified: denial and resistance and awareness and acknowledgement. Two themes were also identified from the changing phase. The first of these is acceptance and knowledge, and the second theme for changing is action and change, under which an action plan was developed and to be implemented district-wide. These themes provided a detailed explanation of the leadership teams lived experiences.
520 $a Further data analysis revealed three overarching themes across the study, indicating how participates came to the decision to provide a more equitable service delivery model; how social justice impacted their decision making, and the creation of a district wide model for decision making. This was seen through three themes: (a) equity for the process, (b) yes, we can do better, and (c) data-driven decision-making.
590 $a School code: 0251.
650 4 $a Education, Leadership. $3 1035576
650 4 $a Education, English as a Second Language. $3 1030294
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0441
710 2 $a Washington State University. $b Educational Leadership. $3 2096601
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-05A(E).
790 $a 0251
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3611266