東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Addressing informatics barriers to c...

Boone, Christopher P. D.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Addressing informatics barriers to conducting observational comparative effectiveness research: A comparative case analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Addressing informatics barriers to conducting observational comparative effectiveness research: A comparative case analysis./
作者:	Boone, Christopher P. D.
面頁冊數:	201 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-12(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-12A(E).
標題:	Political Science, Public Administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3592177
ISBN:	9781303331510

Addressing informatics barriers to conducting observational comparative effectiveness research: A comparative case analysis.
Boone, Christopher P. D.

Addressing informatics barriers to conducting observational comparative effectiveness research: A comparative case analysis. - 201 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-12(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas at Dallas, 2013.

Background: The U.S. health care system has been under immense scrutiny for ever-increasing costs and poor health outcomes for its patients. Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) has emerged as a generally accepted practice by providers, policy makers, and scientists as an approach to identify the most clinical- and cost-effective interventions for treating patients. The objective of CER is to produce the scientific evidence that identifies the most effective approaches to deliver health care services, including: various clinical protocols, drugs, and/or medical devices. Recent investments in CER and health information technology (HIT or informatics) have served as catalysts for producing more electronic clinical data to conduct CER. Patient registries are one of the primary means to generate CER evidence using electronic clinical data; however, these data sources can be highly complex and unsustainable business models.

ISBN: 9781303331510Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017438
Political Science, Public Administration.

Addressing informatics barriers to conducting observational comparative effectiveness research: A comparative case analysis.
LDR:03312nam a2200325 4500 001 1965590
005 20141030134123.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303331510
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3592177
035 $a AAI3592177
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Boone, Christopher P. D. $3 2102269
245 1 0 $a Addressing informatics barriers to conducting observational comparative effectiveness research: A comparative case analysis.
300 $a 201 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-12(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Richard Scotch.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas at Dallas, 2013.
520 $a Background: The U.S. health care system has been under immense scrutiny for ever-increasing costs and poor health outcomes for its patients. Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) has emerged as a generally accepted practice by providers, policy makers, and scientists as an approach to identify the most clinical- and cost-effective interventions for treating patients. The objective of CER is to produce the scientific evidence that identifies the most effective approaches to deliver health care services, including: various clinical protocols, drugs, and/or medical devices. Recent investments in CER and health information technology (HIT or informatics) have served as catalysts for producing more electronic clinical data to conduct CER. Patient registries are one of the primary means to generate CER evidence using electronic clinical data; however, these data sources can be highly complex and unsustainable business models.
520 $a Objective: This study will highlight four U.S.-based patient registry programs that utilize electronic clinical data and discuss how each has built a sustainable business model and addressed the informatics barriers unique to patient registries. The goal is to develop a conceptual framework that can be leveraged by other registry programs and highlight unique challenges that can be addressed by policy.
520 $a Research Question: How can program administrators address informatics barriers to building observational comparative effectiveness research studies using electronic clinical data?
520 $a Methods: The purpose of this multi-case study is to collect, synthesize and share lessons from four U.S.-based patient registries that have built data infrastructures using electronic clinical data for comparative effectiveness research. Using the Boone Framework, my evaluation is focused on challenges that fall into four primary domains, which are: (1) Standards; (2) Information governance; (3) Privacy & information security; and (4) Business model. The author will utilize an interview method to examine the key elements of each patient registry utilizing this framework to: (1) share key lessons learned with practitioners that are looking for build patient registries that utilize electronic clinical data, and (2) identify the public policy implications to building these programs.
590 $a School code: 0382.
650 4 $a Political Science, Public Administration. $3 1017438
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Health Care Management. $3 1017922
650 4 $a Information Technology. $3 1030799
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0769
690 $a 0489
710 2 $a The University of Texas at Dallas. $b Public Affairs. $3 2094987
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-12A(E).
790 $a 0382
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3592177