Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Multilevel factor analysis by model ...
~
Schweig, Jonathan David.
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Multilevel factor analysis by model segregation: Comparing the performance of maximum likelihood and robust test statistics.
Record Type:
Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Multilevel factor analysis by model segregation: Comparing the performance of maximum likelihood and robust test statistics./
Author:
Schweig, Jonathan David.
Description:
48 p.
Notes:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-05.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International52-05(E).
Subject:
Education, General. -
Online resource:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1553273
ISBN:
9781303782985
Multilevel factor analysis by model segregation: Comparing the performance of maximum likelihood and robust test statistics.
Schweig, Jonathan David.
Multilevel factor analysis by model segregation: Comparing the performance of maximum likelihood and robust test statistics.
- 48 p.
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-05.
Thesis (M.S.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2014.
Survey measures of classroom climate and instructional practice have become central to policy efforts that assess school and teacher quality. Measures of classroom climate are often formed by aggregating individual survey responses. This has sparked a wide interest in using multilevel factor analysis to test hypotheses about the psychometric properties of classroom climate variables. One approach to multilevel factor analysis is conducted in two steps. First, the total covariance matrix is partitioned into separate between-group and within-group covariance matrices. Second, conventional factor analysis is used to test models separately. This study shows that when using this approach, rescaled and residual-based test statistics provide better inferences about the between group-level measurement structure than Maximum Likelihood test statistics even when the number of groups is large and there is no excess kurtosis in the observed variables. This study presents an empirical example and a simulation study to demonstrate how item intraclass correlations and within group sample sizes influence test statistic performance.
ISBN: 9781303782985Subjects--Topical Terms:
1019158
Education, General.
Multilevel factor analysis by model segregation: Comparing the performance of maximum likelihood and robust test statistics.
LDR
:02061nam a2200289 4500
001
1965331
005
20141022133320.5
008
150210s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781303782985
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI1553273
035
$a
AAI1553273
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Schweig, Jonathan David.
$3
2101975
245
1 0
$a
Multilevel factor analysis by model segregation: Comparing the performance of maximum likelihood and robust test statistics.
300
$a
48 p.
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-05.
500
$a
Adviser: Peter M. Bentler.
502
$a
Thesis (M.S.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2014.
520
$a
Survey measures of classroom climate and instructional practice have become central to policy efforts that assess school and teacher quality. Measures of classroom climate are often formed by aggregating individual survey responses. This has sparked a wide interest in using multilevel factor analysis to test hypotheses about the psychometric properties of classroom climate variables. One approach to multilevel factor analysis is conducted in two steps. First, the total covariance matrix is partitioned into separate between-group and within-group covariance matrices. Second, conventional factor analysis is used to test models separately. This study shows that when using this approach, rescaled and residual-based test statistics provide better inferences about the between group-level measurement structure than Maximum Likelihood test statistics even when the number of groups is large and there is no excess kurtosis in the observed variables. This study presents an empirical example and a simulation study to demonstrate how item intraclass correlations and within group sample sizes influence test statistic performance.
590
$a
School code: 0031.
650
4
$a
Education, General.
$3
1019158
650
4
$a
Psychology, Psychometrics.
$3
1017742
650
4
$a
Statistics.
$3
517247
690
$a
0463
690
$a
0515
690
$a
0632
710
2
$a
University of California, Los Angeles.
$b
Statistics 0891.
$3
2095317
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
52-05(E).
790
$a
0031
791
$a
M.S.
792
$a
2014
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1553273
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9260330
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login