東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Three papers on the Development and ...

Bevan, Oliver Craig.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Three papers on the Development and Contribution of Ideational Frameworks in Russian Politics, 1917--1934 and 1991--2008.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Three papers on the Development and Contribution of Ideational Frameworks in Russian Politics, 1917--1934 and 1991--2008./
Author:	Bevan, Oliver Craig.
Description:	278 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-02A(E).
Subject:	Political Science, General. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3600140
ISBN:	9781303501418

Three papers on the Development and Contribution of Ideational Frameworks in Russian Politics, 1917--1934 and 1991--2008.
Bevan, Oliver Craig.

Three papers on the Development and Contribution of Ideational Frameworks in Russian Politics, 1917--1934 and 1991--2008. - 278 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 2013.

The central contention of this dissertation is that political scientists have largely ignored the importance of ideational frameworks for resolving problems of policy-making in times of significant upheaval. In order to illustrate the genesis and contribution of these frameworks, the three papers in my dissertation focus on a diachronic comparison of two moments in Russian history that encapsulate maximal uncertainty, covering the aftermath of the imperial collapses in 1917 and 1991. The first paper focuses on state- and nation-building in the North Caucasus, arguing that the debates between the Bolsheviks and other members of the Second International, particularly Otto Bauer, provided the Bolsheviks with a coherent platform that could largely stem the fissiparous tendencies of the region in a way that Boris Yeltsin and his teams were unable to do in the early 1990s. The second paper examines economic policy and finds the reverse to be true: the economic debates of the Second International largely ignored the problem of the peasantry and the exiled status of many of the leading Bolsheviks meant they were unable to articulate a sufficiently detailed policy to apply to the Russian case. The post-communists under the leadership of Yegor Gaidar, were able to draw on decades of economic research, particularly the Chicago and Virginia Schools, that provided the intellectual rationale for dismembering the Communist command-system, but equally important was the years that Gaidar and his team spent developing an alternative in the twilight years of communism. The final paper considers the legacy of ideational frameworks by considering the rule of Stalin and Putin, arguing that the tasks left unfulfilled provide a basis for regime consolidation by subsequent rulers.

ISBN: 9781303501418Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017391
Political Science, General.

Three papers on the Development and Contribution of Ideational Frameworks in Russian Politics, 1917--1934 and 1991--2008.
LDR:02705nam a2200277 4500 001 1965107
005 20141010093003.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303501418
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3600140
035 $a AAI3600140
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Bevan, Oliver Craig. $3 2101717
245 1 0 $a Three papers on the Development and Contribution of Ideational Frameworks in Russian Politics, 1917--1934 and 1991--2008.
300 $a 278 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Timothy J. Colton.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 2013.
520 $a The central contention of this dissertation is that political scientists have largely ignored the importance of ideational frameworks for resolving problems of policy-making in times of significant upheaval. In order to illustrate the genesis and contribution of these frameworks, the three papers in my dissertation focus on a diachronic comparison of two moments in Russian history that encapsulate maximal uncertainty, covering the aftermath of the imperial collapses in 1917 and 1991. The first paper focuses on state- and nation-building in the North Caucasus, arguing that the debates between the Bolsheviks and other members of the Second International, particularly Otto Bauer, provided the Bolsheviks with a coherent platform that could largely stem the fissiparous tendencies of the region in a way that Boris Yeltsin and his teams were unable to do in the early 1990s. The second paper examines economic policy and finds the reverse to be true: the economic debates of the Second International largely ignored the problem of the peasantry and the exiled status of many of the leading Bolsheviks meant they were unable to articulate a sufficiently detailed policy to apply to the Russian case. The post-communists under the leadership of Yegor Gaidar, were able to draw on decades of economic research, particularly the Chicago and Virginia Schools, that provided the intellectual rationale for dismembering the Communist command-system, but equally important was the years that Gaidar and his team spent developing an alternative in the twilight years of communism. The final paper considers the legacy of ideational frameworks by considering the rule of Stalin and Putin, arguing that the tasks left unfulfilled provide a basis for regime consolidation by subsequent rulers.
590 $a School code: 0084.
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a History, Russian and Soviet. $3 1032239
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0724
710 2 $a Harvard University. $b Political Science. $3 2100529
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-02A(E).
790 $a 0084
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3600140