東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Verbal and non-verbal pragmatic defi...

Lange, Heather Jo.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Verbal and non-verbal pragmatic deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury: Perspectives of urban speech-language pathologists.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Verbal and non-verbal pragmatic deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury: Perspectives of urban speech-language pathologists./
Author:	Lange, Heather Jo.
Description:	88 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-05, page: 2997.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International48-05.
Subject:	Health Sciences, Speech Pathology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1484486
ISBN:	9781109733457

Verbal and non-verbal pragmatic deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury: Perspectives of urban speech-language pathologists.
Lange, Heather Jo.

Verbal and non-verbal pragmatic deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury: Perspectives of urban speech-language pathologists. - 88 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-05, page: 2997.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of South Alabama, 2010.

Speech-language pathologist's (SLP's) scope of practice includes assessing and treating cognitive-communication disorders associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although literature describes verbal and non-verbal challenges faced by survivors of TB I, little empirical evidence examines academic preparation and rehabilitation tools used by SLP's. The purpose of this study was to examine perceptions of SLP's who serve adults with TB I in urban healthcare settings about key factors that impact their use of assessment and treatment methods for verbal and non-verbal pragmatic deficits. An online survey questionnaire was distributed to SLP's that examined perceived impact of pragmatic deficits on survivors and their families, use of assessment and treatment procedures, and academic and clinical training. Results suggest SLP's perceive pragmatic deficits as important intervention targets; however, many feel less than prepared to address pragmatic deficits. In addition, many use standardized assessments that do not specifically address pragmatics as part of their assessment procedures. The authors concluded that current rehabilitation tools may not offer a comprehensive assessment of pragmatic challenges related to cognitive-communication disorders, and therefore SLP's may be missing important intervention targets.

ISBN: 9781109733457Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018105
Health Sciences, Speech Pathology.

Verbal and non-verbal pragmatic deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury: Perspectives of urban speech-language pathologists.
LDR:02243nam a2200277 4500 001 1963153
005 20140923133711.5
008 150210s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109733457
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1484486
035 $a AAI1484486
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lange, Heather Jo. $3 2099334
245 1 0 $a Verbal and non-verbal pragmatic deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury: Perspectives of urban speech-language pathologists.
300 $a 88 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-05, page: 2997.
500 $a Adviser: Kelli Evans.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--University of South Alabama, 2010.
520 $a Speech-language pathologist's (SLP's) scope of practice includes assessing and treating cognitive-communication disorders associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although literature describes verbal and non-verbal challenges faced by survivors of TB I, little empirical evidence examines academic preparation and rehabilitation tools used by SLP's. The purpose of this study was to examine perceptions of SLP's who serve adults with TB I in urban healthcare settings about key factors that impact their use of assessment and treatment methods for verbal and non-verbal pragmatic deficits. An online survey questionnaire was distributed to SLP's that examined perceived impact of pragmatic deficits on survivors and their families, use of assessment and treatment procedures, and academic and clinical training. Results suggest SLP's perceive pragmatic deficits as important intervention targets; however, many feel less than prepared to address pragmatic deficits. In addition, many use standardized assessments that do not specifically address pragmatics as part of their assessment procedures. The authors concluded that current rehabilitation tools may not offer a comprehensive assessment of pragmatic challenges related to cognitive-communication disorders, and therefore SLP's may be missing important intervention targets.
590 $a School code: 0491.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Speech Pathology. $3 1018105
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Rehabilitation and Therapy. $3 1017926
690 $a 0460
690 $a 0382
710 2 $a University of South Alabama. $3 1017878
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 48-05.
790 $a 0491
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2010
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1484486