東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Investigating the Relationships betw...

Liu, Hsin-min.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Investigating the Relationships between a Reading Test and Can-do Statements of Performance on Reading Tasks.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Investigating the Relationships between a Reading Test and Can-do Statements of Performance on Reading Tasks./
作者:	Liu, Hsin-min.
面頁冊數:	99 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-04A(E).
標題:	Education, Tests and Measurements. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3607916
ISBN:	9781303656569

Investigating the Relationships between a Reading Test and Can-do Statements of Performance on Reading Tasks.
Liu, Hsin-min.

Investigating the Relationships between a Reading Test and Can-do Statements of Performance on Reading Tasks. - 99 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2014.

One of the fundamental problems in language testing is the lack of adequate generalizability between what a test is measuring and what fulfills the learners' real world language use needs. It is important to recognize that no matter how precise a test measures a construct, if the way that a construct is defined and the way that test tasks are specified do not correspond to the domain of generalization in a meaningful way, test scores may never become adequate indicators of what learners can do with English in real life. This study investigated constructs and tasks of the General English Proficiency Test (GEPT) high-intermediate reading test to explicate the issues involved in generalizing test scores to non-test situations.

ISBN: 9781303656569Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017589
Education, Tests and Measurements.

Investigating the Relationships between a Reading Test and Can-do Statements of Performance on Reading Tasks.
LDR:03985nam a2200313 4500 001 1962408
005 20140805141056.5
008 150210s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303656569
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3607916
035 $a AAI3607916
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Liu, Hsin-min. $3 2098482
245 1 0 $a Investigating the Relationships between a Reading Test and Can-do Statements of Performance on Reading Tasks.
300 $a 99 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Lyle F. Bachman.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2014.
520 $a One of the fundamental problems in language testing is the lack of adequate generalizability between what a test is measuring and what fulfills the learners' real world language use needs. It is important to recognize that no matter how precise a test measures a construct, if the way that a construct is defined and the way that test tasks are specified do not correspond to the domain of generalization in a meaningful way, test scores may never become adequate indicators of what learners can do with English in real life. This study investigated constructs and tasks of the General English Proficiency Test (GEPT) high-intermediate reading test to explicate the issues involved in generalizing test scores to non-test situations.
520 $a The study identified and demonstrated quantitatively and qualitatively the way and extent to which two distinct ways of conceptualizing reading constructs, the trait/curriculum-based and the task/domain-based approaches, could lead to divergent construct specifications, difficulty levels, item/text characteristics, and underlying factor structures, using approaches of expert judgments and confirmatory factor analysis. A total of 242 university students and six trained raters participated in the study. All the participants took the GEPT reading test and a task-based reading test developed based on the can-do statements in the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) and its designated Target Language Use (TLU) domains.
520 $a It was found that when items are more task-based and workplace specific, the less similarity they share with trait/curriculum based test items. The nature and the constituents of the reading comprehension construct shift. Not only do task-based and workplace specific items require a significantly higher amount of complex propositional content to be interpreted rather than recognized, they also demand a wider range and extent of language abilities (ideational, functional, and sociolinguistic) and strategic competence when making such interpretations in relation to context. Among all the combinations of language abilities, that of manipulative function and strategic demand appear to have the most effect on the complexity of reading construct. The ability to comprehend texts then is different from the ability to comprehend texts in context. The very nature of contextualization changes the nature and constituents of the comprehension construct.
520 $a Using Bachman and Palmer's (2010) Assessment Use Argument (AUA) framework, this study strongly suggests that the GEPT is not as meaningful or generalizable as the Language Training and Testing Center (LTTC) claims it is. GEPT test scores do not provide stakeholders with sufficient information about the ability to be assessed in the TLU domain, and the GEPT tasks do not have a sufficient degree of correspondence to the TLU tasks. Due to inadequate sampling of the target constructs and its task characteristics, GEPT test scores do not appear to generalize to performance in the target domain.
590 $a School code: 0031.
650 4 $a Education, Tests and Measurements. $3 1017589
650 4 $a Education, English as a Second Language. $3 1030294
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0441
710 2 $a University of California, Los Angeles. $b Applied Linguistics 0074. $3 2096010
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-04A(E).
790 $a 0031
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3607916