東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Credible commitments, credible threa...

Daniels, Earl Brigham.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Credible commitments, credible threats, and environmental policy.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Credible commitments, credible threats, and environmental policy./
Author:	Daniels, Earl Brigham.
Description:	291 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-04, Section: A, page: 1403.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-04A.
Subject:	Environmental Law. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3398586
ISBN:	9781109719000

Credible commitments, credible threats, and environmental policy.
Daniels, Earl Brigham.

Credible commitments, credible threats, and environmental policy. - 291 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-04, Section: A, page: 1403.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2010.

This dissertation includes three articles. In different ways, each focuses on the way credible threats and credible commitments are used to moderate consumption of environmental and natural resources and commons resources more generally. The first of these three argues that the trend of states jockeying to hold presidential primaries and caucuses as early as possible is a classic tragedy of the commons. This article argues that recognizing the problem as a commons dilemma provides a powerful explanation for the trend towards earlier primaries and, more importantly, provides insights into how best to reform the nomination system. The second applies the work of Thomas Schelling---particularly that focuses on nuclear deterrence---to particularly large regulatory tools given to agencies. The article uses game theory to explain why Congress would give agencies unusually large sticks and how agencies use them. The last article reexamines the foundational literature devoted to overcoming the tragedy of the commons. Specifically, the article argues that institutions most able to solve the tragedy of the commons often cause a tragedy of another sort. The article ends by proposing a set of draft principles to help us overcome institutional rigidity.

ISBN: 9781109719000Subjects--Topical Terms:

676816
Environmental Law.

Credible commitments, credible threats, and environmental policy.
LDR:02111nam a2200265 4500 001 1962148
005 20140804111835.5
008 150210s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109719000
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3398586
035 $a AAI3398586
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Daniels, Earl Brigham. $3 2098170
245 1 0 $a Credible commitments, credible threats, and environmental policy.
300 $a 291 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-04, Section: A, page: 1403.
500 $a Advisers: Jim Salzman; Erika Weinthal.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2010.
520 $a This dissertation includes three articles. In different ways, each focuses on the way credible threats and credible commitments are used to moderate consumption of environmental and natural resources and commons resources more generally. The first of these three argues that the trend of states jockeying to hold presidential primaries and caucuses as early as possible is a classic tragedy of the commons. This article argues that recognizing the problem as a commons dilemma provides a powerful explanation for the trend towards earlier primaries and, more importantly, provides insights into how best to reform the nomination system. The second applies the work of Thomas Schelling---particularly that focuses on nuclear deterrence---to particularly large regulatory tools given to agencies. The article uses game theory to explain why Congress would give agencies unusually large sticks and how agencies use them. The last article reexamines the foundational literature devoted to overcoming the tragedy of the commons. Specifically, the article argues that institutions most able to solve the tragedy of the commons often cause a tragedy of another sort. The article ends by proposing a set of draft principles to help us overcome institutional rigidity.
590 $a School code: 0066.
650 4 $a Environmental Law. $3 676816
690 $a 0439
710 2 $a Duke University. $b Environment. $3 1018684
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-04A.
790 $a 0066
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3398586