東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

School desegregation, law and order,...

Bagley, Joseph M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

School desegregation, law and order, and litigating social justice in Alabama, 1954--1973.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	School desegregation, law and order, and litigating social justice in Alabama, 1954--1973./
作者:	Bagley, Joseph M.
面頁冊數:	804 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-02A(E).
標題:	History, United States. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3600905
ISBN:	9781303512711

School desegregation, law and order, and litigating social justice in Alabama, 1954--1973.
Bagley, Joseph M.

School desegregation, law and order, and litigating social justice in Alabama, 1954--1973. - 804 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgia State University, 2013.

This study examines the legal struggle over school desegregation in Alabama in the two decades following the Supreme Court's Brown v. Board decision of 1954. It seeks to better understand the activists who mounted a litigious assault on segregated education, the segregationists who opposed them, and the ways in which law shaped both of these efforts. Inspired by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People's (NAACP) campaign to implement Brown, blacks sought access to their constitutional rights in the state's federal courts, where they were ultimately able to force substantial compliance. Whites, however, converted massive resistance into an ostensibly colorblind movement to preserve "law and order," while at the same time taking effective measures to preserve segregation and white privilege.

ISBN: 9781303512711Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017393
History, United States.

School desegregation, law and order, and litigating social justice in Alabama, 1954--1973.
LDR:03771nam a2200337 4500 001 1960508
005 20140616133324.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303512711
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3600905
035 $a AAI3600905
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Bagley, Joseph M. $3 2096188
245 1 0 $a School desegregation, law and order, and litigating social justice in Alabama, 1954--1973.
300 $a 804 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Robert Baker; Michelle Brattain.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgia State University, 2013.
520 $a This study examines the legal struggle over school desegregation in Alabama in the two decades following the Supreme Court's Brown v. Board decision of 1954. It seeks to better understand the activists who mounted a litigious assault on segregated education, the segregationists who opposed them, and the ways in which law shaped both of these efforts. Inspired by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People's (NAACP) campaign to implement Brown, blacks sought access to their constitutional rights in the state's federal courts, where they were ultimately able to force substantial compliance. Whites, however, converted massive resistance into an ostensibly colorblind movement to preserve "law and order," while at the same time taking effective measures to preserve segregation and white privilege.
520 $a As soon as the NAACP implementation campaign began, self-styled moderate segregationists began to abandon self-defeating forms of resistance and to fashion a creed of "law and order." When black activists achieved a litigious breakthrough in 1963, the developing creed allowed segregationists to reject violence and outright defiance of the law, to accept token desegregation, and to begin to stake their own claims to constitutional rights---all without forcing them to repudiate segregation and white supremacy. When continuing litigation forced school systems to abandon ineffective "freedom of choice" desegregation plans for compulsory pupil assignment plans, these so-called moderates began using their individual rights language to justify flight to private segregationist academies, independent suburban school systems, and otherwise safely white school districts. Political and legal historians have underappreciated the deep and broad roots of the narrative of white racial innocence, the endurance of massive resistance, and the pivotal role which school desegregation litigation played in channeling both into a broader movement towards modern conservatism.
520 $a The cases considered here---particularly the statewide Lee v. Macon County Board of Education case---demonstrate the effectiveness of litigation in bringing down official state and local barriers to equal opportunity for minorities and in enforcing constitutional law. But they also showcase the limits of litigation in effecting social justice in the face of powerfully constructed narratives of resistance seemingly built upon the nation's founding principles.
520 $a INDEX WORDS: Alabama, Civil rights, School desegregation, Integration, Education, Law, Politics, Litigation, Conservatism, New Right, Social justice, Equality, Constitutional law, Massive resistance, Segregationists, Segregation, White supremacy, Individual rights, Freedom of association, Liberalism, Racial innocence.
590 $a School code: 0079.
650 4 $a History, United States. $3 1017393
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a Education, History of. $3 599244
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0520
710 2 $a Georgia State University. $b History. $3 2096189
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-02A(E).
790 $a 0079
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3600905