東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The politics of judicial process.

Goelzhauser, Greg.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The politics of judicial process.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The politics of judicial process./
Author:	Goelzhauser, Greg.
Description:	109 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-09, Section: A, page: 3487.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-09A.
Subject:	Political Science, General. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3462303
ISBN:	9781124709123

The politics of judicial process.
Goelzhauser, Greg.

The politics of judicial process. - 109 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-09, Section: A, page: 3487.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2010.

How do judges use process to further their goals? The judicial politics literature places disproportionate emphasis on one type of judicial action---the decision on the merits. This emphasis obscures how judges make use of other aspects of the judicial process to advance their goals. In this dissertation, I highlight a variety of ways that judges use aspects of the judicial process other than decisions on the merits to ease internal and external pressures. To establish the widespread and diverse use of process to further judicial goals, I look to the U.S. Supreme Court and state trial courts. Examining the use of process across levels of the judicial hierarchy allows me to account for differences in the institutional rules and internal pressures that distinguish appellate and trial court decision-making. Looking to both federal and state courts, moreover, allows me to highlight important differences in the external pressures that motivate judicial behavior across courts in our federal system. In a series of three empirical studies, I find that judges use process to satisfy a variety of political demands. The results have implications for broadening our understanding of judicial behavior and enhancing our views as to the tools judges have at their disposal for relaxing institutional and political pressures.

ISBN: 9781124709123Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017391
Political Science, General.

The politics of judicial process.
LDR:02193nam a2200289 4500 001 1958586
005 20140426115047.5
008 150210s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124709123
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3462303
035 $a AAI3462303
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Goelzhauser, Greg. $3 2093716
245 1 4 $a The politics of judicial process.
300 $a 109 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-09, Section: A, page: 3487.
500 $a Adviser: Charles Barrilleaux.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2010.
520 $a How do judges use process to further their goals? The judicial politics literature places disproportionate emphasis on one type of judicial action---the decision on the merits. This emphasis obscures how judges make use of other aspects of the judicial process to advance their goals. In this dissertation, I highlight a variety of ways that judges use aspects of the judicial process other than decisions on the merits to ease internal and external pressures. To establish the widespread and diverse use of process to further judicial goals, I look to the U.S. Supreme Court and state trial courts. Examining the use of process across levels of the judicial hierarchy allows me to account for differences in the institutional rules and internal pressures that distinguish appellate and trial court decision-making. Looking to both federal and state courts, moreover, allows me to highlight important differences in the external pressures that motivate judicial behavior across courts in our federal system. In a series of three empirical studies, I find that judges use process to satisfy a variety of political demands. The results have implications for broadening our understanding of judicial behavior and enhancing our views as to the tools judges have at their disposal for relaxing institutional and political pressures.
590 $a School code: 0071.
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Legal Studies. $3 1669774
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0553
710 2 $a The Florida State University. $3 1017727
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-09A.
790 $a 0071
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3462303