東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Open educational resources: A Delphi...

Emerson, Marnice K.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Open educational resources: A Delphi study of instructional design quality.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Open educational resources: A Delphi study of instructional design quality./
Author:	Emerson, Marnice K.
Description:	284 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-11A(E).
Subject:	Education, Instructional Design. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3589239
ISBN:	9781303277252

Open educational resources: A Delphi study of instructional design quality.
Emerson, Marnice K.

Open educational resources: A Delphi study of instructional design quality. - 284 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-11(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2013.

The purpose of this modified Delphi research study was to investigate instructional designers' beliefs about the instructional strategies and activities to be included in a universal framework for designing quality, self-directed, multimedia, open educational resources (OERs). With the rapid growth of availability and use of OERs by a widely diverse audience, designers and users of these resources are expressing growing concern with trusting the instructional quality of the resources. At the present time, there is no universally accepted framework for producing quality self-directed, multimedia OERs. Without this framework, designing quality, self-directed, multimedia OERs for highly heterogeneous and generally unknown users is a challenge for instructional designers when instructional design theory prescribes that instructional quality is dependent on knowing learners and contexts. A three round Delphi study was conducted to investigate the beliefs of a panel of instructional designers who had varying levels of experience designing self-directed, multimedia educational resources. Participants were asked to accept, eliminate, modify or add to a list of instructional strategies and activities derived from instructional design literature. After integration of responses from the three rounds of iterations, 34 of the instructional strategies and activities received full or near full consensus. However, even though participants agreed on the individual strategies and activities, it must be noted that the panel was divided between two factions: Participants who selected the more absolute strategy recommendations (the strategies were interpreted as required strategies) and participants who selected those same strategies but with a variation of phrasing that implied greater flexibility, as when the phrase, when appropriate was added to the strategy description. This study provided a foundation toward developing a set of universally accepted quality instructional strategy and activity standards from a research-based instructional design vantage and the findings will begin to assist instructional designers as well as help to address concerns with the quality of OERs.

ISBN: 9781303277252Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669073
Education, Instructional Design.

Open educational resources: A Delphi study of instructional design quality.
LDR:03089nam a2200289 4500 001 1958524
005 20140421080408.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303277252
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3589239
035 $a AAI3589239
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Emerson, Marnice K. $3 2093636
245 1 0 $a Open educational resources: A Delphi study of instructional design quality.
300 $a 284 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-11(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Kerry Burner.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2013.
520 $a The purpose of this modified Delphi research study was to investigate instructional designers' beliefs about the instructional strategies and activities to be included in a universal framework for designing quality, self-directed, multimedia, open educational resources (OERs). With the rapid growth of availability and use of OERs by a widely diverse audience, designers and users of these resources are expressing growing concern with trusting the instructional quality of the resources. At the present time, there is no universally accepted framework for producing quality self-directed, multimedia OERs. Without this framework, designing quality, self-directed, multimedia OERs for highly heterogeneous and generally unknown users is a challenge for instructional designers when instructional design theory prescribes that instructional quality is dependent on knowing learners and contexts. A three round Delphi study was conducted to investigate the beliefs of a panel of instructional designers who had varying levels of experience designing self-directed, multimedia educational resources. Participants were asked to accept, eliminate, modify or add to a list of instructional strategies and activities derived from instructional design literature. After integration of responses from the three rounds of iterations, 34 of the instructional strategies and activities received full or near full consensus. However, even though participants agreed on the individual strategies and activities, it must be noted that the panel was divided between two factions: Participants who selected the more absolute strategy recommendations (the strategies were interpreted as required strategies) and participants who selected those same strategies but with a variation of phrasing that implied greater flexibility, as when the phrase, when appropriate was added to the strategy description. This study provided a foundation toward developing a set of universally accepted quality instructional strategy and activity standards from a research-based instructional design vantage and the findings will begin to assist instructional designers as well as help to address concerns with the quality of OERs.
590 $a School code: 1351.
650 4 $a Education, Instructional Design. $3 1669073
650 4 $a Multimedia Communications. $3 1057801
650 4 $a Education, Technology of. $3 1018012
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0558
690 $a 0710
710 2 $a Capella University. $b School of Education. $3 1018430
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-11A(E).
790 $a 1351
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3589239