東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Social dating goals and STD /HIV ris...

Wilson, Karen.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Social dating goals and STD /HIV risk perceptions in romantic relationships.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Social dating goals and STD /HIV risk perceptions in romantic relationships./
Author:	Wilson, Karen.
Description:	85 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-07, Section: B, page: 4488.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-07B.
Subject:	Psychology, Social. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3324236
ISBN:	9780549757122

Social dating goals and STD /HIV risk perceptions in romantic relationships.
Wilson, Karen.

Social dating goals and STD /HIV risk perceptions in romantic relationships. - 85 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-07, Section: B, page: 4488.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Saint Louis University, 2008.

This research examined the influence of dating goals, relationship status, and the presence of physical safety information on judgments of a romantic partners' emotional and physical risk (e.g., HIV/STD risk), as well as the perceived dating goals of the partner and satisfaction with the relationship. Two studies were completed on a sample of college students. In Study 1 participants read one of four hypothetical scenarios depicting either a casual or serious relationship with a target person and were asked to imagine themselves in the relationship. The scenarios also differed based upon whether there was physical safety information about the target (i.e., HIV testing information). All of the scenarios were described as being sexual in nature. Study 1 also examined manipulated and self-reported dating goals and how they interacted with relationship type and physical safety information variables. Manipulated and self-reported dating goals had little effect on the dependent variables. There were significant interactions of relationship type and physical safety information such that targets in serious relationships where no physical safety information was present were seen as the most physically safe and least at risk for HIV or other STDs. The likelihood of condom use within these relationships was also the lowest of the four types and the hypothetical relationship was seen as the most satisfying of the four types of relationships. The results of Study 1 support previous findings suggesting that serious relationships are perceived as being less associated with HIV/STD risk. There was also evidence that there was a bias toward viewing individuals who had an HIV test as being at higher risk, even though the reason for the test had little to do with their sexual behavior. Study 2 examined the effect of how individuals approach their intimacy goals in relationships in terms of their self-regulatory focus. Participants read the same serious relationship scenarios as in Study 1 and completed a self-regulatory focus priming task. There were no significant effects or interactions except that individuals primed with a prevention focus were more likely to report using condoms with the target in the scenarios.

ISBN: 9780549757122Subjects--Topical Terms:

529430
Psychology, Social.

Social dating goals and STD /HIV risk perceptions in romantic relationships.
LDR:03050nam 2200253 4500 001 1957872
005 20140214104430.5
008 150212s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549757122
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3324236
035 $a AAI3324236
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Wilson, Karen. $3 2084534
245 1 0 $a Social dating goals and STD /HIV risk perceptions in romantic relationships.
300 $a 85 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-07, Section: B, page: 4488.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Saint Louis University, 2008.
520 $a This research examined the influence of dating goals, relationship status, and the presence of physical safety information on judgments of a romantic partners' emotional and physical risk (e.g., HIV/STD risk), as well as the perceived dating goals of the partner and satisfaction with the relationship. Two studies were completed on a sample of college students. In Study 1 participants read one of four hypothetical scenarios depicting either a casual or serious relationship with a target person and were asked to imagine themselves in the relationship. The scenarios also differed based upon whether there was physical safety information about the target (i.e., HIV testing information). All of the scenarios were described as being sexual in nature. Study 1 also examined manipulated and self-reported dating goals and how they interacted with relationship type and physical safety information variables. Manipulated and self-reported dating goals had little effect on the dependent variables. There were significant interactions of relationship type and physical safety information such that targets in serious relationships where no physical safety information was present were seen as the most physically safe and least at risk for HIV or other STDs. The likelihood of condom use within these relationships was also the lowest of the four types and the hypothetical relationship was seen as the most satisfying of the four types of relationships. The results of Study 1 support previous findings suggesting that serious relationships are perceived as being less associated with HIV/STD risk. There was also evidence that there was a bias toward viewing individuals who had an HIV test as being at higher risk, even though the reason for the test had little to do with their sexual behavior. Study 2 examined the effect of how individuals approach their intimacy goals in relationships in terms of their self-regulatory focus. Participants read the same serious relationship scenarios as in Study 1 and completed a self-regulatory focus priming task. There were no significant effects or interactions except that individuals primed with a prevention focus were more likely to report using condoms with the target in the scenarios.
590 $a School code: 0193.
650 4 $a Psychology, Social. $3 529430
690 $a 0451
710 2 $a Saint Louis University. $3 1020558
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 69-07B.
790 $a 0193
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3324236