東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Epistemic relativism : = a construct...

Seidel, Markus,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Epistemic relativism : = a constructive critique /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Epistemic relativism :/ Markus Seidel.
其他題名:	a constructive critique /
作者:	Seidel, Markus,
面頁冊數:	1 online resource.
內容註:	Setting the stage: Epistemic Relativism in the Strong Programme and Beyond -- Realism and the Argument from Underdetermination -- Norm-circularity -- Epistemic Absolutism that Explains the Relativist's Intuition -- Summary and Outlook.
標題:	Science - Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://link.springer.com/10.1057/9781137377890
ISBN:	1137377895 (electronic bk.)

Epistemic relativism : = a constructive critique /
Seidel, Markus,

Epistemic relativism :a constructive critique /Markus Seidel. - 1 online resource.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Setting the stage: Epistemic Relativism in the Strong Programme and Beyond -- Realism and the Argument from Underdetermination -- Norm-circularity -- Epistemic Absolutism that Explains the Relativist's Intuition -- Summary and Outlook.

Are our beliefs justified only relatively to a specific culture or society? Is it possible to give reasons for the superiority of our scientific, epistemic methods? Markus Seidel sets out to answer these questions in his critique of epistemic relativism. Focusing on the work of the most prominent, explicitly relativist position in the sociology of scientific knowledge -- so-called 'Edinburgh relativism' or the 'Strong Programme', he scrutinizes the key arguments for epistemic relativism from a philosophical perspective: underdetermination and norm-circularity. His main negative result is that these arguments fall short of establishing epistemic relativism. Despite arguing for epistemic absolutism, Seidel aims to provide an account of non-relative justification that nevertheless integrates the basic, correct intuition of the epistemic relativist. His main positive result is that the epistemic absolutist can very well accept the idea that people using different standards of justification can be equally justified in holding their beliefs: Rational disagreement, he maintains, is perfectly possible. The book provides a detailed critique of relativism in the sociology of scientific knowledge and beyond. With its constructive part it aims at making conciliatory steps in a highly embittered discussion between sociology and philosophy of science.

ISBN: 1137377895 (electronic bk.)

Source: 702668Palgrave Macmillanhttp://www.palgraveconnect.com

Nat. Bib. Agency Control No.: 016684941UkSubjects--Topical Terms:

523660
Science
--Philosophy.Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

LC Class. No.: BD221

Dewey Class. No.: 115

Epistemic relativism : = a constructive critique /
LDR:02748cmm a2200349Ki 4500 001 1950565
003 OCoLC
005 20140910115812.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 231227s2014 enk ob 001 0 eng d
016 7 $a 016684941 $2 Uk
020 $a 1137377895 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9781137377890 (electronic bk.)
035 $a (OCoLC)875406073
035 $a ocn875406073
035 $a 1950565
037 $a 702668 $b Palgrave Macmillan $n http://www.palgraveconnect.com
040 $a UKPGM $b eng $e rda $e pn $c UKPGM $d UKMGB $d YDXCP $d CDX $d IDEBK $d OCLCF
049 $a TEFA
050 4 $a BD221
082 0 4 $a 115 $2 23
100 1 $a Seidel, Markus, $e author. $3 3648897
245 1 0 $a Epistemic relativism : $b a constructive critique / $c Markus Seidel.
264 1 $a [Basingstoke] : $b Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2014.
300 $a 1 online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $a Setting the stage: Epistemic Relativism in the Strong Programme and Beyond -- Realism and the Argument from Underdetermination -- Norm-circularity -- Epistemic Absolutism that Explains the Relativist's Intuition -- Summary and Outlook.
520 $a Are our beliefs justified only relatively to a specific culture or society? Is it possible to give reasons for the superiority of our scientific, epistemic methods? Markus Seidel sets out to answer these questions in his critique of epistemic relativism. Focusing on the work of the most prominent, explicitly relativist position in the sociology of scientific knowledge -- so-called 'Edinburgh relativism' or the 'Strong Programme', he scrutinizes the key arguments for epistemic relativism from a philosophical perspective: underdetermination and norm-circularity. His main negative result is that these arguments fall short of establishing epistemic relativism. Despite arguing for epistemic absolutism, Seidel aims to provide an account of non-relative justification that nevertheless integrates the basic, correct intuition of the epistemic relativist. His main positive result is that the epistemic absolutist can very well accept the idea that people using different standards of justification can be equally justified in holding their beliefs: Rational disagreement, he maintains, is perfectly possible. The book provides a detailed critique of relativism in the sociology of scientific knowledge and beyond. With its constructive part it aims at making conciliatory steps in a highly embittered discussion between sociology and philosophy of science.
588 $a Description based on publisher supplied information; title not viewed.
650 0 $a Science $x Philosophy. $3 523660
650 0 $a Knowledge, Theory of. $3 523921
650 0 $a Relativity. $3 519452
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
710 2 $a Palgrave Connect (Online service) $3 1081578
856 4 0 $3 Palgrave Connect $u http://link.springer.com/10.1057/9781137377890