東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Comparison of standard test methods ...

Kwon, Myoungsook.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparison of standard test methods for measuring the performance of waterproof, windproof, and breathable shell fabrics.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Comparison of standard test methods for measuring the performance of waterproof, windproof, and breathable shell fabrics./
Author:	Kwon, Myoungsook.
Description:	192 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-04, Section: B, page: 2041.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International62-04B.
Subject:	Textile Technology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3013110
ISBN:	0493229868

Comparison of standard test methods for measuring the performance of waterproof, windproof, and breathable shell fabrics.
Kwon, Myoungsook.

Comparison of standard test methods for measuring the performance of waterproof, windproof, and breathable shell fabrics. - 192 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-04, Section: B, page: 2041.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Kansas State University, 2001.

The purpose of this study was to create a database of information on the performance characteristics of 28 waterproof, windproof, and breathable (WWB) shell fabrics used in outdoor apparel and to correlate and compare data collected with eight different test methods. Water resistance was measured according to ASTM D 751 (Mullen test---with and without a fabric support and the hydrostatic head test). Wind resistance was measured using the air permeability test (ASTM D 737). Breathability was determined by measuring the water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) (ASTM E 96 upright and inverted cup tests, JIS L 1099 desiccant inverted cup) and the evaporative resistance (ISO 11092 sweating hot plate).

ISBN: 0493229868Subjects--Topical Terms:

1020710
Textile Technology.

Comparison of standard test methods for measuring the performance of waterproof, windproof, and breathable shell fabrics.
LDR:03249nmm 2200277 4500 001 1864824
005 20041216133438.5
008 130614s2001 eng d
020 $a 0493229868
035 $a (UnM)AAI3013110
035 $a AAI3013110
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Kwon, Myoungsook. $3 1952292
245 1 0 $a Comparison of standard test methods for measuring the performance of waterproof, windproof, and breathable shell fabrics.
300 $a 192 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-04, Section: B, page: 2041.
500 $a Adviser: Elizabeth A. McCullough.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Kansas State University, 2001.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to create a database of information on the performance characteristics of 28 waterproof, windproof, and breathable (WWB) shell fabrics used in outdoor apparel and to correlate and compare data collected with eight different test methods. Water resistance was measured according to ASTM D 751 (Mullen test---with and without a fabric support and the hydrostatic head test). Wind resistance was measured using the air permeability test (ASTM D 737). Breathability was determined by measuring the water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) (ASTM E 96 upright and inverted cup tests, JIS L 1099 desiccant inverted cup) and the evaporative resistance (ISO 11092 sweating hot plate).
520 $a Fabrics with a microporous or monolithic treatment had negligible or no air permeability (i.e., high wind resistance). Fabrics with only a DWR finish had higher air permeability. The air permeability test had negative and statistically significant correlations with all water resistance tests. The fabrics could withstand higher levels of water pressure before penetration on the Mullen test with a support than on the standard Mullen test, and both generated higher pressures than the hydrostatic head test, probably because the pressure was applied at a faster rate. Sixteen of the fabrics were not penetrated at the maximum water pressure on each test. The water resistance tests had high significant correlations with each other. There appeared to be no trade off between water resistance and breathability for the majority of WWB fabrics since microporous and monolithic treatments provide both performance characteristics. High WVTRs and low evaporative resistance values are desirable for fabric breathability and comfort. The WVTRs were consistently highest when measured with the desiccant inverted cup, followed by the inverted cup, followed by the upright cup. All breathability tests showed significant correlations with each other, except for the upright and inverted cup. The desiccant inverted cup and the sweating hot plate showed the highest correlation (-0.93). The Japanese desiccant inverted cup method appears to be the most preferred method for manufacturers to use because it requires less fabric, time, and environmental controls, and the apparatus and supplies are not expensive.
590 $a School code: 0100.
650 4 $a Textile Technology. $3 1020710
690 $a 0994
710 2 0 $a Kansas State University. $3 1017593
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 62-04B.
790 1 0 $a McCullough, Elizabeth A., $e advisor
790 $a 0100
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2001
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3013110