東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Love or theosis? A critique of Tuomo...

Lee, Jeha.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Love or theosis? A critique of Tuomo Mannermaa's "new paradigm" of Luther research in light of Luther's concept of love in his commentary on the First Epistle of John (1527) (Martin Luther).

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Love or theosis? A critique of Tuomo Mannermaa's "new paradigm" of Luther research in light of Luther's concept of love in his commentary on the First Epistle of John (1527) (Martin Luther)./
Author:	Lee, Jeha.
Description:	254 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-06, Section: A, page: 2136.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-06A.
Subject:	Theology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3095393

Love or theosis? A critique of Tuomo Mannermaa's "new paradigm" of Luther research in light of Luther's concept of love in his commentary on the First Epistle of John (1527) (Martin Luther).
Lee, Jeha.

Love or theosis? A critique of Tuomo Mannermaa's "new paradigm" of Luther research in light of Luther's concept of love in his commentary on the First Epistle of John (1527) (Martin Luther). - 254 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-06, Section: A, page: 2136.

Thesis (Th.D.)--Boston University School of Theology, 2003.

In 1978, Tuomo Mannermaa presented a "new paradigm" of Luther interpretation in his In ipsa fide Christus adest, where he argued that theosis (divinization) is the central motif in Luther's theology. Since then a "Mannermaa school" of Luther studies has developed his theology in related theological areas such as ontology, ethics, and ecumenics. This dissertation critiques Mannermaa's paradigm through an analysis of Luther's commentary on I John, and demonstrates that the central motif in this commentary is not theosis but a theology of love.Subjects--Topical Terms:

516533
Theology.

Love or theosis? A critique of Tuomo Mannermaa's "new paradigm" of Luther research in light of Luther's concept of love in his commentary on the First Epistle of John (1527) (Martin Luther).
LDR:02972nmm 2200313 4500 001 1863657
005 20041215130324.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3095393
035 $a AAI3095393
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Lee, Jeha. $3 1951171
245 1 0 $a Love or theosis? A critique of Tuomo Mannermaa's "new paradigm" of Luther research in light of Luther's concept of love in his commentary on the First Epistle of John (1527) (Martin Luther).
300 $a 254 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-06, Section: A, page: 2136.
500 $a Major Professor: Carter Lindberg.
502 $a Thesis (Th.D.)--Boston University School of Theology, 2003.
520 $a In 1978, Tuomo Mannermaa presented a "new paradigm" of Luther interpretation in his In ipsa fide Christus adest, where he argued that theosis (divinization) is the central motif in Luther's theology. Since then a "Mannermaa school" of Luther studies has developed his theology in related theological areas such as ontology, ethics, and ecumenics. This dissertation critiques Mannermaa's paradigm through an analysis of Luther's commentary on I John, and demonstrates that the central motif in this commentary is not theosis but a theology of love.
520 $a Following the introduction and literature review of Mannermaa's argument (chapters 1--2), the dissertation analyses Luther's commentary on I John (chapters 3--7). The main body of the dissertation includes an examination of Luther's Christology and soteriology (chapter 3), Christian identity and ethical responsibility (chapter 4), the dialectical relationship of divine love and Christian love (chapter 5), Pneumatology and its soteriological significance (chapter 6), and the role of divine love in the theory and practice of Christian spirituality (chapter 7). The final chapter (8) provides a critique of Mannermaa's thesis based upon Luther's concept of love in his commentary on I John.
520 $a The dissertation demonstrates that the Mannermaa paradigm of theosis is not adequate to understand Luther's commentary on I John. The dissertation's emphasis upon Luther's theology of love and the renewal of Christian life also presents a "systematic theology" of a Johannine Luther that serves to supplement present Luther scholarship which focuses exclusively upon a theology of justification.
520 $a The dissertation provides a possibility of reinterpretation of Luther's theology as a theology of love that can be a more effective ground than Mannermaa's paradigm for an ecumenical dialogue among the Roman Catholic Church, the Orthodox Church, and the Lutheran Church.
590 $a School code: 1038.
650 4 $a Theology. $3 516533
650 4 $a Religion, Biblical Studies. $3 1020189
650 4 $a History, Medieval. $3 925067
690 $a 0469
690 $a 0321
690 $a 0581
710 2 0 $a Boston University School of Theology. $3 1017700
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-06A.
790 1 0 $a Lindberg, Carter, $e advisor
790 $a 1038
791 $a Th.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3095393