Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Comparison of gasolines using gas ch...
~
Barnes, Aisha Tamara.
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Comparison of gasolines using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and target ion response.
Record Type:
Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Comparison of gasolines using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and target ion response./
Author:
Barnes, Aisha Tamara.
Description:
70 p.
Notes:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-01, page: 0233.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International42-01.
Subject:
Chemistry, Analytical. -
Online resource:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1414623
Comparison of gasolines using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and target ion response.
Barnes, Aisha Tamara.
Comparison of gasolines using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and target ion response.
- 70 p.
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-01, page: 0233.
Thesis (M.S.)--Michigan State University, 2003.
Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry was used to compare gasoline samples obtained from different sources based on the difference in response of the ion detector to the target ions of certain components found in gasoline. Many suspected arson cases involve comparing an accelerant extracted from fire debris to an ignitable liquid found in a suspect's possession to determine if it could have been used in the fire. These types of comparisons are currently based on pattern recognition and component identification and do not take into account the variation that exists in some commonly used accelerants such as gasoline. Fifty and seventy-five percent-evaporated gasoline samples were both found to contain similar ratios of certain components when compared to the same source gasoline unevaporated. This research proposes ratios to be used to determine if an unevaporated gasoline sample could have originated from the same source as an evaporated gasoline extract from fire debris. The results of the comparisons in this study demonstrate that for cases involving gasoline as the accelerant, that has been evaporated up to 50% and extracted from pine, it is possible to eliminate comparison samples as originating from the same source. The results of the 75% comparisons suggest it may be possible to apply the same type of comparison to cases involving 75% evaporated gasoline.Subjects--Topical Terms:
586156
Chemistry, Analytical.
Comparison of gasolines using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and target ion response.
LDR
:02243nmm 2200277 4500
001
1858681
005
20041020093008.5
008
130614s2003 eng d
035
$a
(UnM)AAI1414623
035
$a
AAI1414623
040
$a
UnM
$c
UnM
100
1
$a
Barnes, Aisha Tamara.
$3
1946365
245
1 0
$a
Comparison of gasolines using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and target ion response.
300
$a
70 p.
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-01, page: 0233.
500
$a
Adviser: Jay Siegel.
502
$a
Thesis (M.S.)--Michigan State University, 2003.
520
$a
Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry was used to compare gasoline samples obtained from different sources based on the difference in response of the ion detector to the target ions of certain components found in gasoline. Many suspected arson cases involve comparing an accelerant extracted from fire debris to an ignitable liquid found in a suspect's possession to determine if it could have been used in the fire. These types of comparisons are currently based on pattern recognition and component identification and do not take into account the variation that exists in some commonly used accelerants such as gasoline. Fifty and seventy-five percent-evaporated gasoline samples were both found to contain similar ratios of certain components when compared to the same source gasoline unevaporated. This research proposes ratios to be used to determine if an unevaporated gasoline sample could have originated from the same source as an evaporated gasoline extract from fire debris. The results of the comparisons in this study demonstrate that for cases involving gasoline as the accelerant, that has been evaporated up to 50% and extracted from pine, it is possible to eliminate comparison samples as originating from the same source. The results of the 75% comparisons suggest it may be possible to apply the same type of comparison to cases involving 75% evaporated gasoline.
590
$a
School code: 0128.
650
4
$a
Chemistry, Analytical.
$3
586156
650
4
$a
Engineering, Environmental.
$3
783782
650
4
$a
Sociology, Criminology and Penology.
$3
1017569
690
$a
0486
690
$a
0775
690
$a
0627
710
2 0
$a
Michigan State University.
$3
676168
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
42-01.
790
1 0
$a
Siegel, Jay,
$e
advisor
790
$a
0128
791
$a
M.S.
792
$a
2003
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1414623
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9177381
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login