東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The effect of the SEC's Regulation F...

Yang, Rong.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The effect of the SEC's Regulation Fair Disclosure on analyst forecast attributes and related market reactions.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The effect of the SEC's Regulation Fair Disclosure on analyst forecast attributes and related market reactions./
Author:	Yang, Rong.
Description:	90 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-05, Section: A, page: 1852.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International65-05A.
Subject:	Business Administration, Accounting. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3131764
ISBN:	0496790048

The effect of the SEC's Regulation Fair Disclosure on analyst forecast attributes and related market reactions.
Yang, Rong.

The effect of the SEC's Regulation Fair Disclosure on analyst forecast attributes and related market reactions. - 90 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-05, Section: A, page: 1852.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - Newark, 2004.

On October 23, 2000, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Regulation Fair Disclosure (hereafter Reg. FD), which prohibits selective disclosure of material nonpublic information to certain financial analysts, institutional investors and others prior to making it available to the general public. This study examines the effect of Reg. FD on analyst forecast performance and market reactions for both closed-call firms and open-call firms as compared to the non-conference-call firms in the pre-Reg. FD and the post-Reg. FD periods. It investigates whether Reg. FD influenced analyst earnings forecast errors and forecast dispersion for the previous closed-call firms in the post-Reg. FD period as compared to the previous open-call firms since some analysts lost their exclusive access to the management after the implementation of Reg. FD. More importantly, it investigates whether the price changes around earnings announcements for both previous closed-call firms and previous open-call firms were the same as intended by the SEC. Since previous studies found conference calls improve analyst forecast performance and increase the information gap between the analysts privy to the call and the remainder of investors before Reg. FD took effect (Bowen, Davis and Matsumoto 2002), this study further analyzes analyst forecast attributes and market reactions between the open-call firms and the closed-call firms after the release of Reg. FD.

ISBN: 0496790048Subjects--Topical Terms:

1020666
Business Administration, Accounting.

The effect of the SEC's Regulation Fair Disclosure on analyst forecast attributes and related market reactions.
LDR:03538nmm 2200289 4500 001 1849694
005 20051207081941.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
020 $a 0496790048
035 $a (UnM)AAI3131764
035 $a AAI3131764
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Yang, Rong. $3 1573027
245 1 4 $a The effect of the SEC's Regulation Fair Disclosure on analyst forecast attributes and related market reactions.
300 $a 90 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-05, Section: A, page: 1852.
500 $a Director: Yaw Mensah.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - Newark, 2004.
520 $a On October 23, 2000, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Regulation Fair Disclosure (hereafter Reg. FD), which prohibits selective disclosure of material nonpublic information to certain financial analysts, institutional investors and others prior to making it available to the general public. This study examines the effect of Reg. FD on analyst forecast performance and market reactions for both closed-call firms and open-call firms as compared to the non-conference-call firms in the pre-Reg. FD and the post-Reg. FD periods. It investigates whether Reg. FD influenced analyst earnings forecast errors and forecast dispersion for the previous closed-call firms in the post-Reg. FD period as compared to the previous open-call firms since some analysts lost their exclusive access to the management after the implementation of Reg. FD. More importantly, it investigates whether the price changes around earnings announcements for both previous closed-call firms and previous open-call firms were the same as intended by the SEC. Since previous studies found conference calls improve analyst forecast performance and increase the information gap between the analysts privy to the call and the remainder of investors before Reg. FD took effect (Bowen, Davis and Matsumoto 2002), this study further analyzes analyst forecast attributes and market reactions between the open-call firms and the closed-call firms after the release of Reg. FD.
520 $a The study provides evidence that analysts made more accurate forecasts for closed-call firms as compared to the non-conference-call firms in both pre- and post-Reg. FD periods. Moreover, analysts made more accurate forecast for open-call firms as compared to closed-call firms in the pre-Reg. FD period, whereas there is no significant difference between analyst forecast performance for the previous open-call and the previous closed-call firms in the post-Reg. FD period. Meanwhile, market reactions around earnings announcement dates in three different windows, (-1, +1), (-2, +4) and (-5, +10), are significantly different between the open-call firms and the closed-call firms prior to the release of Reg. FD, whereas these differences disappear after the implementation of Reg. FD. In addition, the first and second Reg. FD events are the most significant events during those six events leading to the passage of Reg. FD.
520 $a Overall, these findings imply that, to some extent, Reg. FD did "level the playing field" for financial analysts and investors, consistent with Reg. FD's success in eliminating selective disclosure.
590 $a School code: 0461.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Accounting. $3 1020666
690 $a 0272
710 2 0 $a Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - Newark. $3 1017745
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 65-05A.
790 1 0 $a Mensah, Yaw, $e advisor
790 $a 0461
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3131764