東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Heidegger's disciplines: The projec...

Bozeman, Omar.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Heidegger's disciplines: The project of fundamental ontology and the practice of hermeneutic phenomenology in "Being and Time" (Martin Heidegger).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Heidegger's disciplines: The project of fundamental ontology and the practice of hermeneutic phenomenology in "Being and Time" (Martin Heidegger)./
作者:	Bozeman, Omar.
面頁冊數:	457 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-05, Section: A, page: 1809.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International65-05A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3132767
ISBN:	0496800078

Heidegger's disciplines: The project of fundamental ontology and the practice of hermeneutic phenomenology in "Being and Time" (Martin Heidegger).
Bozeman, Omar.

Heidegger's disciplines: The project of fundamental ontology and the practice of hermeneutic phenomenology in "Being and Time" (Martin Heidegger). - 457 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-05, Section: A, page: 1809.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University, 2005.

In Being and Time, Heidegger attempts to show how the understanding of being that figures in all self-relations to individual existence can become an explicit philosophical theme; but since no conventions exist in everyday talk and theoretical discourse for invoking everyday self-relations as understanding of being, and since there are no everyday problems or possibilities that require strictly ontological interpretations of everyday experience, it is hard for readers to accept the terms of his project. Indeed, Being and Time seems a patchwork of practical and cultural themes that may serve his ontological aims, and of ethical and religious ones that do not. Yet use of terms like practical, cultural, ethical, and religious to describe the analytic's themes wrongly presupposes that Heidegger uses heterogeneous interpretive frameworks to identify his field. Contending, to the contrary, that his sole interpretive framework and his themes have a homogeneous character, I argue that Heideggers disciplines represent developments of what he calls Rucksicht and Nacbsicht, our ways of looking after or looking out for one another in our individual reflexive relations to existence, since it is to such looking that individual, inadvertent confrontations with the difference between being and beings appear as a phenomenon. In the dissertation I explicate and defend Heidegger's arguments for fundamental ontology; examining his methodological commentary and his analyses as methodological exemplars, I articulate the conditions for exercising his disciplines and for recognizing oneself as disposing over non-Heideggerian motives for seeing the analytic's themes as exemplifying only understanding of being (not practice, culture, etc.). In discussing formal indication, existential concepts, existential projections, and phenomenological reduction, I show why Heidegger turns to authors such as Kierkegaard, Augustine, and Aristotle (who implicitly exemplify the looking in question) to revise Husserl's phenomenology. Using only the interpretive language of looking and speaking correlative to individual self-relations to existence, studying only Heidegger's routines for showing how to see reflective and reflexive individuality casting being itself as a phenomenon, and asking only whether he identifies a unitary thematic field, I argue that fundamental ontology does respond to an unrecognized concern over and interest in ontological difference.

ISBN: 0496800078Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.

Heidegger's disciplines: The project of fundamental ontology and the practice of hermeneutic phenomenology in "Being and Time" (Martin Heidegger).
LDR:03436nmm 2200277 4500 001 1849375
005 20051206073025.5
008 130614s2005 eng d
020 $a 0496800078
035 $a (UnM)AAI3132767
035 $a AAI3132767
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Bozeman, Omar. $3 1937335
245 1 0 $a Heidegger's disciplines: The project of fundamental ontology and the practice of hermeneutic phenomenology in "Being and Time" (Martin Heidegger).
300 $a 457 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-05, Section: A, page: 1809.
500 $a Major Professor: Daniel O. Dahlstrom.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University, 2005.
520 $a In Being and Time, Heidegger attempts to show how the understanding of being that figures in all self-relations to individual existence can become an explicit philosophical theme; but since no conventions exist in everyday talk and theoretical discourse for invoking everyday self-relations as understanding of being, and since there are no everyday problems or possibilities that require strictly ontological interpretations of everyday experience, it is hard for readers to accept the terms of his project. Indeed, Being and Time seems a patchwork of practical and cultural themes that may serve his ontological aims, and of ethical and religious ones that do not. Yet use of terms like practical, cultural, ethical, and religious to describe the analytic's themes wrongly presupposes that Heidegger uses heterogeneous interpretive frameworks to identify his field. Contending, to the contrary, that his sole interpretive framework and his themes have a homogeneous character, I argue that Heideggers disciplines represent developments of what he calls Rucksicht and Nacbsicht, our ways of looking after or looking out for one another in our individual reflexive relations to existence, since it is to such looking that individual, inadvertent confrontations with the difference between being and beings appear as a phenomenon. In the dissertation I explicate and defend Heidegger's arguments for fundamental ontology; examining his methodological commentary and his analyses as methodological exemplars, I articulate the conditions for exercising his disciplines and for recognizing oneself as disposing over non-Heideggerian motives for seeing the analytic's themes as exemplifying only understanding of being (not practice, culture, etc.). In discussing formal indication, existential concepts, existential projections, and phenomenological reduction, I show why Heidegger turns to authors such as Kierkegaard, Augustine, and Aristotle (who implicitly exemplify the looking in question) to revise Husserl's phenomenology. Using only the interpretive language of looking and speaking correlative to individual self-relations to existence, studying only Heidegger's routines for showing how to see reflective and reflexive individuality casting being itself as a phenomenon, and asking only whether he identifies a unitary thematic field, I argue that fundamental ontology does respond to an unrecognized concern over and interest in ontological difference.
590 $a School code: 0017.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Religion, Philosophy of. $3 1017774
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0322
710 2 0 $a Boston University. $3 1017454
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 65-05A.
790 1 0 $a Dahlstrom, Daniel O., $e advisor
790 $a 0017
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3132767