東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Determining the validity of a new cy...

Parrott, James Allen.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Determining the validity of a new cycle ergometer protocol for estimating VO(2)max.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Determining the validity of a new cycle ergometer protocol for estimating VO(2)max./
Author:	Parrott, James Allen.
Description:	37 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-03, page: 0748.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International42-03.
Subject:	Education, Sciences. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1416904
ISBN:	0496216880

Determining the validity of a new cycle ergometer protocol for estimating VO(2)max.
Parrott, James Allen.

Determining the validity of a new cycle ergometer protocol for estimating VO(2)max. - 37 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-03, page: 0748.

Thesis (M.S.)--Old Dominion University, 2003.

The current American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) submaximal cycle ergometer protocol has been evaluated by several researchers for its validity in estimating maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max). It has been found that the ACSM protocol overestimates VO2max by 28% on average (Swain and Wright, 1997). It is felt that the short stage duration, only 3 minutes, of the ACSM protocol is largely responsible for this overestimation. The new submaximal cycle ergometer protocol evaluated here utilizes a 6-minute stage in an attempt to reduce the overestimation of VO2max while increasing the overall test validity.

ISBN: 0496216880Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017897
Education, Sciences.

Determining the validity of a new cycle ergometer protocol for estimating VO(2)max.
LDR:02099nmm 2200301 4500 001 1843121
005 20051010101601.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
020 $a 0496216880
035 $a (UnM)AAI1416904
035 $a AAI1416904
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Parrott, James Allen. $3 1931364
245 1 0 $a Determining the validity of a new cycle ergometer protocol for estimating VO(2)max.
300 $a 37 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-03, page: 0748.
500 $a Director: David P. Swain.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Old Dominion University, 2003.
520 $a The current American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) submaximal cycle ergometer protocol has been evaluated by several researchers for its validity in estimating maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max). It has been found that the ACSM protocol overestimates VO2max by 28% on average (Swain and Wright, 1997). It is felt that the short stage duration, only 3 minutes, of the ACSM protocol is largely responsible for this overestimation. The new submaximal cycle ergometer protocol evaluated here utilizes a 6-minute stage in an attempt to reduce the overestimation of VO2max while increasing the overall test validity.
520 $a Results. A regression performed on actual VO2max vs. the VO2 Reserve method of VO2max estimation showed an r-value of 0.89, and an SEE of 3.97 ml· min-1.kg-1. The mean value of actual VO2max was 36.9 +/- 8.8 ml·min-1. kg-1, while that for the VO2R estimated VO2max was 36.7 +/- 8.4 ml·min-1.kg -1. A regression performed on actual VO2max vs. the Astrand estimate of VO2max showed an r-value of 0.82, and an SEE of 5.09 ml·min-1.kg-1. The mean value for the Astrand estimate of VO2max was 39.8 +/- 11.1 ml·min-1.kg-1. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
590 $a School code: 0418.
650 4 $a Education, Sciences. $3 1017897
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Recreation. $3 1018003
650 4 $a Education, Physical. $3 1018000
690 $a 0714
690 $a 0575
690 $a 0523
710 2 0 $a Old Dominion University. $3 1020684
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 42-03.
790 1 0 $a Swain, David P., $e advisor
790 $a 0418
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1416904