東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Is the principal evaluation model in...

James, Cheryl Marie.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Is the principal evaluation model in line with the changing role of the principal in site-based management schools?

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Is the principal evaluation model in line with the changing role of the principal in site-based management schools?/
Author:	James, Cheryl Marie.
Description:	213 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-05, Section: A, page: 1518.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International58-05A.
Subject:	Education, Administration. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9733072
ISBN:	0591425424

Is the principal evaluation model in line with the changing role of the principal in site-based management schools?
James, Cheryl Marie.

Is the principal evaluation model in line with the changing role of the principal in site-based management schools? - 213 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-05, Section: A, page: 1518.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Southern California, 1997.

The restructuring of educational governance is shifting the locus of responsibility to various forms of local school site councils called site-based management (SBM). This change raises a variety of issues that underscore the need to reexamine the role of the principal and the objectives, methods, and uses of evaluation in determining principal effectiveness. In districts and schools implementing local site governance, reform of school-site decision making has given little pre-implementation attention to restructuring's impact on principal assessment. This study extends the school effectiveness studies by examining current principal evaluation models, determining the extent to which they address SBM reforms, and analyzing ways that existing mismatches between decentralization and principal evaluation models impact reform efforts.

ISBN: 0591425424Subjects--Topical Terms:

626645
Education, Administration.

Is the principal evaluation model in line with the changing role of the principal in site-based management schools?
LDR:03222nmm 2200289 4500 001 1842463
005 20050921082104.5
008 130614s1997 eng d
020 $a 0591425424
035 $a (UnM)AAI9733072
035 $a AAI9733072
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a James, Cheryl Marie. $3 1930723
245 1 0 $a Is the principal evaluation model in line with the changing role of the principal in site-based management schools?
300 $a 213 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-05, Section: A, page: 1518.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Southern California, 1997.
520 $a The restructuring of educational governance is shifting the locus of responsibility to various forms of local school site councils called site-based management (SBM). This change raises a variety of issues that underscore the need to reexamine the role of the principal and the objectives, methods, and uses of evaluation in determining principal effectiveness. In districts and schools implementing local site governance, reform of school-site decision making has given little pre-implementation attention to restructuring's impact on principal assessment. This study extends the school effectiveness studies by examining current principal evaluation models, determining the extent to which they address SBM reforms, and analyzing ways that existing mismatches between decentralization and principal evaluation models impact reform efforts.
520 $a Both the survey method and in-depth interviews were utilized in this investigation. Two hundred principals from Long Beach Unified School District (LBUSD), Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), Chicago District 299, and districts across the state of Kentucky and the United Kingdom were asked to complete a 27-item survey instrument. Sixty-eight percent of the principals completed the survey.
520 $a There was found to be a link between principal evaluation models and the school governance reform in all districts represented in this study; however, the extent of the linkage varied from district to district. The greatest connection between principal evaluation models and SBM was in the state of Kentucky. Districts across the United Kingdom represented the second strongest connection between principal evaluation models and SBM. In districts such as LAUSD and LBUSD principals noted that SBM had not led to a change in the principal evaluation process but that there were components of the principal evaluation model that supported the SBM process. Principals in Chicago reported that the evaluation process had not changed since the initiation of SBM.
520 $a In districts where principal evaluation models were vague, principals found the evaluation process to support SBM. In Kentucky, principals believed that the entire school governance process was supported by a formative evaluation process that was ongoing and supported by resources, programs, and state-appointed personnel.
590 $a School code: 0208.
650 4 $a Education, Administration. $3 626645
650 4 $a Education, Curriculum and Instruction. $3 576301
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0727
710 2 0 $a University of Southern California. $3 700129
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 58-05A.
790 $a 0208
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 1997
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9733072