東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Preaching science or promoting citiz...

DeCesare, Michael A.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Preaching science or promoting citizenship? Teaching sociology in high school.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Preaching science or promoting citizenship? Teaching sociology in high school./
Author:	DeCesare, Michael A.
Description:	252 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-06, Section: A, page: 2367.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International65-06A.
Subject:	Sociology, General. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3136719
ISBN:	0496839154

Preaching science or promoting citizenship? Teaching sociology in high school.
DeCesare, Michael A.

Preaching science or promoting citizenship? Teaching sociology in high school. - 252 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-06, Section: A, page: 2367.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2004.

This dissertation seeks to answer two questions. First, why is an introductory sociology course offered in only some high schools? Second, what are the larger historical, intellectual, and structural forces that have shaped and currently shape the content and objectives of high school sociology courses, and how have they exerted an influence? The first question has been answered only once before and the second has never been asked. Regarding the first, I argue that teacher changes and shortages, students' needs and desires, ongoing curriculum revision, the movement toward standardized testing, and the school budget all play a role in determining whether sociology is offered in a particular school from one year to the next. My attempt to answer the second research question brings together the subfields of the sociology of sociology and the scholarship of teaching and learning. I demonstrate that teachers' decisions about course content and objectives are not entirely idiosyncratic, as is often implicitly assumed in the scholarship of teaching and learning. I show instead that decisions about the content and objectives of the high school course are the products of both individual and contextual factors, thus bringing the sociology of sociology's insights to bear on teaching. Specifically, I document how two groups have tried to shape the high school sociology course. On one hand, teachers have consistently taught social problems with an eye toward developing good citizens. Their formulation of content and objectives has been shaped by the historical and social context, curriculum pressures, the textbook market, students' needs and desires, and the limits of their own backgrounds and educations. Sociologists, on the other hand, have pushed for scientific sociology in the high school classroom, especially since 1960. They have been influenced by the persistent tension within sociology between science and reform, by the New Social Studies movement of the 1960s, and by the activities and position of the American Sociological Association. I conclude with practical recommendations for bridging the historical gap between teachers and sociologists. I also recommend paying more empirical and theoretical attention to the study of teaching sociology generally.

ISBN: 0496839154Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017541
Sociology, General.

Preaching science or promoting citizenship? Teaching sociology in high school.
LDR:03211nmm 2200289 4500 001 1841025
005 20050822121247.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
020 $a 0496839154
035 $a (UnM)AAI3136719
035 $a AAI3136719
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a DeCesare, Michael A. $3 1929340
245 1 0 $a Preaching science or promoting citizenship? Teaching sociology in high school.
300 $a 252 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-06, Section: A, page: 2367.
500 $a Director: Michael S. Lewis.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2004.
520 $a This dissertation seeks to answer two questions. First, why is an introductory sociology course offered in only some high schools? Second, what are the larger historical, intellectual, and structural forces that have shaped and currently shape the content and objectives of high school sociology courses, and how have they exerted an influence? The first question has been answered only once before and the second has never been asked. Regarding the first, I argue that teacher changes and shortages, students' needs and desires, ongoing curriculum revision, the movement toward standardized testing, and the school budget all play a role in determining whether sociology is offered in a particular school from one year to the next. My attempt to answer the second research question brings together the subfields of the sociology of sociology and the scholarship of teaching and learning. I demonstrate that teachers' decisions about course content and objectives are not entirely idiosyncratic, as is often implicitly assumed in the scholarship of teaching and learning. I show instead that decisions about the content and objectives of the high school course are the products of both individual and contextual factors, thus bringing the sociology of sociology's insights to bear on teaching. Specifically, I document how two groups have tried to shape the high school sociology course. On one hand, teachers have consistently taught social problems with an eye toward developing good citizens. Their formulation of content and objectives has been shaped by the historical and social context, curriculum pressures, the textbook market, students' needs and desires, and the limits of their own backgrounds and educations. Sociologists, on the other hand, have pushed for scientific sociology in the high school classroom, especially since 1960. They have been influenced by the persistent tension within sociology between science and reform, by the New Social Studies movement of the 1960s, and by the activities and position of the American Sociological Association. I conclude with practical recommendations for bridging the historical gap between teachers and sociologists. I also recommend paying more empirical and theoretical attention to the study of teaching sociology generally.
590 $a School code: 0118.
650 4 $a Sociology, General. $3 1017541
650 4 $a Education, Secondary. $3 539262
650 4 $a Education, Sociology of. $3 626654
690 $a 0626
690 $a 0533
690 $a 0340
710 2 0 $a University of Massachusetts Amherst. $3 1019433
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 65-06A.
790 1 0 $a Lewis, Michael S., $e advisor
790 $a 0118
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3136719