東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Concerns of non- and low users of te...

Henrickson, Kerry L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Concerns of non- and low users of technology in the classroom among part- and full-time community college faculty.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Concerns of non- and low users of technology in the classroom among part- and full-time community college faculty./
作者:	Henrickson, Kerry L.
面頁冊數:	304 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-04, Section: A, page: 1352.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-04A.
標題:	Education, Community College. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3263153
ISBN:	9780549015475

Concerns of non- and low users of technology in the classroom among part- and full-time community college faculty.
Henrickson, Kerry L.

Concerns of non- and low users of technology in the classroom among part- and full-time community college faculty. - 304 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-04, Section: A, page: 1352.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2007.

Technology is pervasive in society, but has been slow to permeate the higher education classroom. While some professors use technology to calculate grades and generate tests, few use technology in the classroom to support learning and instruction. Faculty members at the community college in this study had access to technology, but only a small number used technology for instructional purposes. To understand why some instructors are not using technology in the classroom, this study examined concerns about technology use among part- and full-time community college instructors. The Stages of Concern about an Innovation Questionnaire (SoCQ) and Technology Integration Standards Configuration Matrix (TISCM) were used in conjunction with statistical analyses of demographic data to assess if part- and full-time faculty members share similar concerns about technology use in the classroom and to determine if patterns of use were similar among the two groups. The results revealed that part- and full-time instructors did not differ with respect to their concerns about, and levels of use of, technology in the classroom and can therefore be considered a single group for training and support purposes. Most faculty members were in the early stages of adoption of the innovation, based on their SoCQ peak concern scores and average SoCQ concerns profile. Instructor age was not correlated with concerns about technology use in the classroom and nonusers and low-users of technology were found to have correctly assessed their level of technology use in the classroom. However, one-third of self-identified integrators were found to have inaccurately assessed their level of use. A cluster analysis grouped these individuals with self-assessed nonusers, rather than with other integrators. Results from the TISCM indicated that most faculty members used technology to enhance personal productivity, but fewer used technology to deliver content in the classroom and very few infused technology into student learning activities. Analysis of open-ended responses revealed that some faculty members held erroneous beliefs about technology and its use for instruction and learning. Based on these findings, a tri-faceted interventional program for encouraging technology use---including institutional interventions, cultural interventions and logistical/training interventions---is proposed and discussed.

ISBN: 9780549015475Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018008
Education, Community College.

Concerns of non- and low users of technology in the classroom among part- and full-time community college faculty.
LDR:03491nmm 2200325 4500 001 1835771
005 20071226141954.5
008 130610s2007 eng d
020 $a 9780549015475
035 $a (UMI)AAI3263153
035 $a AAI3263153
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Henrickson, Kerry L. $3 1924394
245 1 0 $a Concerns of non- and low users of technology in the classroom among part- and full-time community college faculty.
300 $a 304 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-04, Section: A, page: 1352.
500 $a Adviser: Pamela Hanfelt.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2007.
520 $a Technology is pervasive in society, but has been slow to permeate the higher education classroom. While some professors use technology to calculate grades and generate tests, few use technology in the classroom to support learning and instruction. Faculty members at the community college in this study had access to technology, but only a small number used technology for instructional purposes. To understand why some instructors are not using technology in the classroom, this study examined concerns about technology use among part- and full-time community college instructors. The Stages of Concern about an Innovation Questionnaire (SoCQ) and Technology Integration Standards Configuration Matrix (TISCM) were used in conjunction with statistical analyses of demographic data to assess if part- and full-time faculty members share similar concerns about technology use in the classroom and to determine if patterns of use were similar among the two groups. The results revealed that part- and full-time instructors did not differ with respect to their concerns about, and levels of use of, technology in the classroom and can therefore be considered a single group for training and support purposes. Most faculty members were in the early stages of adoption of the innovation, based on their SoCQ peak concern scores and average SoCQ concerns profile. Instructor age was not correlated with concerns about technology use in the classroom and nonusers and low-users of technology were found to have correctly assessed their level of technology use in the classroom. However, one-third of self-identified integrators were found to have inaccurately assessed their level of use. A cluster analysis grouped these individuals with self-assessed nonusers, rather than with other integrators. Results from the TISCM indicated that most faculty members used technology to enhance personal productivity, but fewer used technology to deliver content in the classroom and very few infused technology into student learning activities. Analysis of open-ended responses revealed that some faculty members held erroneous beliefs about technology and its use for instruction and learning. Based on these findings, a tri-faceted interventional program for encouraging technology use---including institutional interventions, cultural interventions and logistical/training interventions---is proposed and discussed.
590 $a School code: 1351.
650 4 $a Education, Community College. $3 1018008
650 4 $a Education, Technology. $3 1017498
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
690 $a 0275
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0745
710 2 0 $a Capella University. $b School of Education. $3 1018430
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-04A.
790 1 0 $a Hanfelt, Pamela, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Hanfelt, Carole $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Hruskocy, Carole $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Perry, David $e committee member
790 $a 1351
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3263153