東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The development of a matrix for the ...

Torcivia, Elizabeth M.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The development of a matrix for the evaluation of clinical reasoning in occupational therapists.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The development of a matrix for the evaluation of clinical reasoning in occupational therapists./
Author:	Torcivia, Elizabeth M.
Description:	325 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-02, Section: B, page: 0869.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-02B.
Subject:	Health Sciences, Education. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3252218

The development of a matrix for the evaluation of clinical reasoning in occupational therapists.
Torcivia, Elizabeth M.

The development of a matrix for the evaluation of clinical reasoning in occupational therapists. - 325 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-02, Section: B, page: 0869.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Seton Hall University, 2007.

Problem. To date, no agreed-upon standard to analyze or evaluate clinical reasoning in occupational therapy exists either in practice or as part of the educational process. Many authors have defined types of clinical reasoning but no analytic tools or exemplars of reasoning have been presented.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017921
Health Sciences, Education.

The development of a matrix for the evaluation of clinical reasoning in occupational therapists.
LDR:02760nmm 2200301 4500 001 1834611
005 20071127114953.5
008 130610s2007 eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI3252218
035 $a AAI3252218
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Torcivia, Elizabeth M. $3 1923251
245 1 4 $a The development of a matrix for the evaluation of clinical reasoning in occupational therapists.
300 $a 325 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-02, Section: B, page: 0869.
500 $a Adviser: Genevieve Pinto-Zipp.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Seton Hall University, 2007.
520 $a Problem. To date, no agreed-upon standard to analyze or evaluate clinical reasoning in occupational therapy exists either in practice or as part of the educational process. Many authors have defined types of clinical reasoning but no analytic tools or exemplars of reasoning have been presented.
520 $a Method. The author developed two multimedia cases which were validated in an earlier study by experienced clinicians. The cases were paired with the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework categories in a Delphi study and sent to occupational therapy "experts". The strength of a Delphi rests heavily on the level of expertise of the experts, care was taken to recruit experts that represented academic expertise, clinical competence and demonstrated familiarity with both the Practice Framework terms and elements of clinical reasoning. The 18 respondents were authors in refereed occupational therapy publications, faculty with >five years academic experience and/or Board Certified in Neurorehabilitation by the American Occupational Therapy Association.
520 $a Results. Three Delphi rounds were completed by all respondents. Respondents agreed on inclusion of 87.5% of categories of the Practice Framework relative to the content of the two multimedia cases. Agreement was not reached on 11.5% of the categories.
520 $a Conclusions. Responses regarding the Practice Framework categories were divided into include, exclude and neither. A matrix for each case was developed that presented the included categories agreed upon by the respondents in the study. Use of the matrix and the corresponding case study can be used to compare interventions with the findings of the experts. Limitations of the study include the existence of only two validated cases, the nature of Delphi research and the limitations of the Practice Framework language.
590 $a School code: 0199.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Education. $3 1017921
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Rehabilitation and Therapy. $3 1017926
690 $a 0350
690 $a 0382
710 2 0 $a Seton Hall University. $3 1026097
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-02B.
790 1 0 $a Pinto-Zipp, Genevieve, $e advisor
790 $a 0199
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3252218