東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Actual and desired use of instructio...

Dick, Philip Curtis.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Actual and desired use of instructional technology in studio art courses.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Actual and desired use of instructional technology in studio art courses./
Author:	Dick, Philip Curtis.
Description:	121 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-11, Section: A, page: 4111.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-11A.
Subject:	Education, Art. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3240560
ISBN:	9780542953590

Actual and desired use of instructional technology in studio art courses.
Dick, Philip Curtis.

Actual and desired use of instructional technology in studio art courses. - 121 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-11, Section: A, page: 4111.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Texas A&M University - Commerce, 2006.

This study gathered data regarding 4-year university studio art faculty's actual use and desired use of instruction technology. A literature review revealed a demand for instructional technology in the university classroom and a reticence by faculty to use. The literature review also showed a lack of studies concerning instructional technology use by studio art faculty. The studies that were available found that fine art departments and faculty lagged behind other disciplines in their use of instructional technology.

ISBN: 9780542953590Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018432
Education, Art.

Actual and desired use of instructional technology in studio art courses.
LDR:03158nmm 2200313 4500 001 1834433
005 20071119145649.5
008 130610s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542953590
035 $a (UMI)AAI3240560
035 $a AAI3240560
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Dick, Philip Curtis. $3 1923085
245 1 0 $a Actual and desired use of instructional technology in studio art courses.
300 $a 121 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-11, Section: A, page: 4111.
500 $a Adviser: Susan Espinoza.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Texas A&M University - Commerce, 2006.
520 $a This study gathered data regarding 4-year university studio art faculty's actual use and desired use of instruction technology. A literature review revealed a demand for instructional technology in the university classroom and a reticence by faculty to use. The literature review also showed a lack of studies concerning instructional technology use by studio art faculty. The studies that were available found that fine art departments and faculty lagged behind other disciplines in their use of instructional technology.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to determine how much instructional technology was being used and if studio art faculty perceived a need for greater use. A researcher-developed survey was sent to a random sample of studio art faculty from 87 universities (4-year) with accredited art programs in seven states (Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Louisiana, Colorado, Arkansas, and Arizona). Data were collected from 137 participants, a 50% return rate based on a sample size of 274. Four hypotheses were analyzed using the dependent samples t test and tested to alpha=.01 level. All four hypotheses were rejected and all four hypotheses found that a significant difference existed at p<.001 level. The hypotheses found that studio art faculty believed that instructional technology, presentation technologies, production technologies, and communication technologies should be used more than they were used for studio art instruction.
520 $a Two research questions looked at the demographic characteristics of technology using faculty and non-technology using faculty. Technology using faculty differed little from non-technology using faculty. This study also looked at individual instructional technology use by studio art faculty. Studio art faculty reported using Internet for teacher research, slide projector, Internet for student research, and email most frequently. Studio art faculty felt that the same four technologies should be used more than they were being used. Technologies least used were Internet discussion, spreadsheet software, database software, graphics tablet, and smart board/smart classroom. Least recommended for increased use were database software and spreadsheet software.
590 $a School code: 1287.
650 4 $a Education, Art. $3 1018432
650 4 $a Education, Technology. $3 1017498
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
690 $a 0273
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0745
710 2 0 $a Texas A&M University - Commerce. $3 1022729
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-11A.
790 1 0 $a Espinoza, Susan, $e advisor
790 $a 1287
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3240560