東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An analysis of the different way of ...

Hur, In-Sub.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An analysis of the different way of thinking of Indian Yogacara and Chinese Fa-hsiang school.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An analysis of the different way of thinking of Indian Yogacara and Chinese Fa-hsiang school./
作者:	Hur, In-Sub.
面頁冊數:	195 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-11, Section: A, page: 4774.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International57-11A.
標題:	Religion, Philosophy of. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9713952
ISBN:	9780591216615

An analysis of the different way of thinking of Indian Yogacara and Chinese Fa-hsiang school.
Hur, In-Sub.

An analysis of the different way of thinking of Indian Yogacara and Chinese Fa-hsiang school. - 195 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-11, Section: A, page: 4774.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Hawai'i at Manoa, 1996.

This dissertation is aimed at disclosing the theoretical characteristics of Chinese Fa-hsiang school through a comparison with Indian Yogacara. In order to get a clear picture of Indian Yogacara and Chinese Fa-hsiang school, this paper begins with an examination of the Indian and Chinese mythological ways of thinking, and then goes onto the Upanisad and Taoism as philosophical ways of thinking.

ISBN: 9780591216615Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017774
Religion, Philosophy of.

An analysis of the different way of thinking of Indian Yogacara and Chinese Fa-hsiang school.
LDR:03259nmm 2200337 4500 001 1831732
005 20070711070511.5
008 130610s1996 eng d
020 $a 9780591216615
035 $a (UnM)AAI9713952
035 $a AAI9713952
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Hur, In-Sub. $3 1920501
245 1 3 $a An analysis of the different way of thinking of Indian Yogacara and Chinese Fa-hsiang school.
300 $a 195 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-11, Section: A, page: 4774.
500 $a Chairperson: David J. Kalupahana.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Hawai'i at Manoa, 1996.
520 $a This dissertation is aimed at disclosing the theoretical characteristics of Chinese Fa-hsiang school through a comparison with Indian Yogacara. In order to get a clear picture of Indian Yogacara and Chinese Fa-hsiang school, this paper begins with an examination of the Indian and Chinese mythological ways of thinking, and then goes onto the Upanisad and Taoism as philosophical ways of thinking.
520 $a In order to find the relationship among the various modes of thinking shown in the above subjects, I adopt two perspectives--a trichotomous way of thinking, which frequently appears to express feeling of continuity, and a dichotomous way of thinking, which appears to express discrepancy among things. By applying these two perspectives to analyze the characteristics of and the relationship between various modes of thinking, the following are disclosed.
520 $a First, through the analysis of the Indian and Chinese mythological thinking, it is shown how the trichotomous way of thinking as the blending of mythical and logical thinking was developed differently in India and in China.
520 $a Second, based on the difference between these two mythological ways of thinking, the emergence of different ways of philosophical thinking--the Upanisadic way and the Taoist way--is explained. The Upanisadic way of thinking enhanced the development of a metaphysical 'dichotomous transcending way of thinking,' while Classical Taoism developed an anti-metaphysical 'circulative trichotomic way of thinking.'
520 $a Third, a 'projective trichotomic way of thinking' as the anti-metaphysical way of thinking in Indian Yogacara is drawn from the analysis of some Buddhist texts and Vasubandhu's works. This anti-metaphysical way of thinking was transformed through Metaphysical Taoism to form a 'dichotomically transformed trichotomic way of thinking' in Chinese Fa-hsiang school. The illumination of these two modes of thinking enables us to find the similarity and difference between Indian Yogacara and Chinese Fa-hsiang school.
520 $a The way of discussion in this dissertation will help not only to find the differences among other Indian and Chinese Buddhist schools but also to develop a reasonable scheme to compare the different ways of thinking that are rooted in different cultures.
590 $a School code: 0085.
650 4 $a Religion, Philosophy of. $3 1017774
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
690 $a 0322
690 $a 0422
710 2 0 $a University of Hawai'i at Manoa. $3 1017511
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 57-11A.
790 1 0 $a Kalupahana, David J., $e advisor
790 $a 0085
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1996
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9713952