東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Social norms, group identification, ...

Ding, Stephanie Brigitte.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Social norms, group identification, and conformity: The difference between conversion and compliance on conformity to social norms.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Social norms, group identification, and conformity: The difference between conversion and compliance on conformity to social norms./
Author:	Ding, Stephanie Brigitte.
Description:	136 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: B, page: 3462.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-06B.
Subject:	Psychology, Social. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3179122
ISBN:	9780542190285

Social norms, group identification, and conformity: The difference between conversion and compliance on conformity to social norms.
Ding, Stephanie Brigitte.

Social norms, group identification, and conformity: The difference between conversion and compliance on conformity to social norms. - 136 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: B, page: 3462.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas at Arlington, 2005.

Pool, Ding, and Schwegler (2001) predicted that people who value and adopt the group identity more closely conform to the norms of the group than people who do not. Although high identifiers showed significantly greater levels of norm conformity, even low identifiers showed some degree of norm-congruent behavior. The present study proposed that whereas the behavioral responses of high and low identifiers were in the same direction, the psychological processes underlying the observed behavior maybe due to different types of social influence, namely conversion and compliance. Distinguishing between these different types of conformity may provide an explanation for those previous findings.

ISBN: 9780542190285Subjects--Topical Terms:

529430
Psychology, Social.

Social norms, group identification, and conformity: The difference between conversion and compliance on conformity to social norms.
LDR:03280nmm 2200301 4500 001 1823716
005 20061128083816.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542190285
035 $a (UnM)AAI3179122
035 $a AAI3179122
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Ding, Stephanie Brigitte. $3 1912814
245 1 0 $a Social norms, group identification, and conformity: The difference between conversion and compliance on conformity to social norms.
300 $a 136 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: B, page: 3462.
500 $a Supervisor: Gregory J. Pool.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas at Arlington, 2005.
520 $a Pool, Ding, and Schwegler (2001) predicted that people who value and adopt the group identity more closely conform to the norms of the group than people who do not. Although high identifiers showed significantly greater levels of norm conformity, even low identifiers showed some degree of norm-congruent behavior. The present study proposed that whereas the behavioral responses of high and low identifiers were in the same direction, the psychological processes underlying the observed behavior maybe due to different types of social influence, namely conversion and compliance. Distinguishing between these different types of conformity may provide an explanation for those previous findings.
520 $a Following the Pool et al. (2001) paradigm, participants believed they were joining a preexisting group as part of an experiment investigating group interaction. Group identification was manipulated by varying the group's acceptance of the participant. Social norms were manipulated by having participants watch a videotape of the group performing the target behavior; group members' behavior communicated that producing high quality work was the norm. In addition, the degree to which participants' performance was publicly observable was varied. As predicted, participants who were marginally accepted by the group and reported low levels of identification with the group, only showed norm-congruent behavior if they believed their performance would be publicly observable. These findings are in line with Nail, McDonald, and Levy's (2000) social response model in which conversion refers to conformity at both the public (behavioral responses) and private (attitudinal) levels. Compliance occurs when conformity is thought to trigger favorable reactions from the source of influence.
520 $a Furthermore, analyses of participants' motives were in line with the predictions made by Deviance Regulation Theory (Blanton & Christi, 2003) and indicated low identifiers also adhered to the group norm in the public performance condition to avoid undesirable ways of deviating from social norms. These results provide preliminary experimental evidence that both compliance and conversion will lead to adherence to social norms, although the underlying psychological mechanisms associated with each differ.
590 $a School code: 2502.
650 4 $a Psychology, Social. $3 529430
650 4 $a Psychology, Experimental. $3 517106
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0623
710 2 0 $a The University of Texas at Arlington. $3 1025869
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-06B.
790 1 0 $a Pool, Gregory J., $e advisor
790 $a 2502
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3179122