東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

A comparison of decontextualized and...

Smith, Carey E.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A comparison of decontextualized and contextualized reading skills in persons with severe aphasia.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	A comparison of decontextualized and contextualized reading skills in persons with severe aphasia./
Author:	Smith, Carey E.
Description:	89 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 43-06, page: 2226.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International43-06.
Subject:	Health Sciences, Speech Pathology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1427067
ISBN:	9780542138751

A comparison of decontextualized and contextualized reading skills in persons with severe aphasia.
Smith, Carey E.

A comparison of decontextualized and contextualized reading skills in persons with severe aphasia. - 89 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 43-06, page: 2226.

Thesis (M.S.)--Duquesne University, 2005.

A repeated measures comparative design compared the reading comprehension accuracy scores of three participants across two conditions: Condition A---Decontextualized Stimulus Reading Task (DSRT), resembling traditional reading therapy, and Condition B---Contextual Choice Reading Conversation (CCRC) with a communication partner. In the DSRT condition, participants read a sentence-length question prior to selecting one of 3-to-5 printed responses with no supports. In CCRC, partners presented graphic sentence stimuli representing conversational questions and response choices with the following supports: simultaneous auditory input, supplemental drawings or gestures, natural repetitions, consistent topic, and conversational order. Experimental conditions were administered in counterbalanced order across 5 sessions. Responses were scored for accuracy based on factual world knowledge (DSRT) or verification by spouses or family members, for a maximum of 10 points for each session per condition. Raw scores, mean scores, and standard deviations from each condition were compared with descriptive and nonparametric statistics. Results showed significant improvement in reading comprehension accuracy when the CCRC method was applied. Clinically, this suggests that persons with severe aphasia can read well enough to use partner supported conversations that utilize reading comprehension.

ISBN: 9780542138751Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018105
Health Sciences, Speech Pathology.

A comparison of decontextualized and contextualized reading skills in persons with severe aphasia.
LDR:02261nmm 2200265 4500 001 1820724
005 20061114121308.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542138751
035 $a (UnM)AAI1427067
035 $a AAI1427067
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Smith, Carey E. $3 1909935
245 1 2 $a A comparison of decontextualized and contextualized reading skills in persons with severe aphasia.
300 $a 89 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 43-06, page: 2226.
500 $a Adviser: Kathryn L. Garrett.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Duquesne University, 2005.
520 $a A repeated measures comparative design compared the reading comprehension accuracy scores of three participants across two conditions: Condition A---Decontextualized Stimulus Reading Task (DSRT), resembling traditional reading therapy, and Condition B---Contextual Choice Reading Conversation (CCRC) with a communication partner. In the DSRT condition, participants read a sentence-length question prior to selecting one of 3-to-5 printed responses with no supports. In CCRC, partners presented graphic sentence stimuli representing conversational questions and response choices with the following supports: simultaneous auditory input, supplemental drawings or gestures, natural repetitions, consistent topic, and conversational order. Experimental conditions were administered in counterbalanced order across 5 sessions. Responses were scored for accuracy based on factual world knowledge (DSRT) or verification by spouses or family members, for a maximum of 10 points for each session per condition. Raw scores, mean scores, and standard deviations from each condition were compared with descriptive and nonparametric statistics. Results showed significant improvement in reading comprehension accuracy when the CCRC method was applied. Clinically, this suggests that persons with severe aphasia can read well enough to use partner supported conversations that utilize reading comprehension.
590 $a School code: 0067.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Speech Pathology. $3 1018105
690 $a 0460
710 2 0 $a Duquesne University. $3 1017927
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 43-06.
790 1 0 $a Garrett, Kathryn L., $e advisor
790 $a 0067
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1427067