東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Comparison of two training procedure...

Manriquez, Bertha.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparison of two training procedures: Fading versus trial and error.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Comparison of two training procedures: Fading versus trial and error./
Author:	Manriquez, Bertha.
Description:	79 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 43-06, page: 2225.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International43-06.
Subject:	Health Sciences, Speech Pathology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1430949
ISBN:	9780542030994

Comparison of two training procedures: Fading versus trial and error.
Manriquez, Bertha.

Comparison of two training procedures: Fading versus trial and error. - 79 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 43-06, page: 2225.

Thesis (M.S.)--The University of Texas at El Paso, 2005.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of two training procedures, fading and trial & error designed to train equivalency relations and test for generalization to untrained relationships. Thirty college students were recruited to participate in the study and were randomly assigned into three groups, fading, trial & error, and control. The participants were presented with stimuli via a proprietary computer program Brain Power (Salvatore & Biswas, 2000). The chosen stimuli were nonsense symbols, which eliminated any previous history of reinforcement with language symbols. Though previous studies have shown fading training to produce fewer errors than trial & error training, in this study the results demonstrated that the trial & error group produced fewer errors and was more successful in generalizing to untrained relationships over the fading group.

ISBN: 9780542030994Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018105
Health Sciences, Speech Pathology.

Comparison of two training procedures: Fading versus trial and error.
LDR:01759nmm 2200277 4500 001 1820722
005 20061114121307.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542030994
035 $a (UnM)AAI1430949
035 $a AAI1430949
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Manriquez, Bertha. $3 1909933
245 1 0 $a Comparison of two training procedures: Fading versus trial and error.
300 $a 79 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 43-06, page: 2225.
500 $a Adviser: Anthony P. Salvatore.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--The University of Texas at El Paso, 2005.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of two training procedures, fading and trial & error designed to train equivalency relations and test for generalization to untrained relationships. Thirty college students were recruited to participate in the study and were randomly assigned into three groups, fading, trial & error, and control. The participants were presented with stimuli via a proprietary computer program Brain Power (Salvatore & Biswas, 2000). The chosen stimuli were nonsense symbols, which eliminated any previous history of reinforcement with language symbols. Though previous studies have shown fading training to produce fewer errors than trial & error training, in this study the results demonstrated that the trial & error group produced fewer errors and was more successful in generalizing to untrained relationships over the fading group.
590 $a School code: 0459.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Speech Pathology. $3 1018105
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1017810
690 $a 0460
690 $a 0633
710 2 0 $a The University of Texas at El Paso. $3 1057446
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 43-06.
790 1 0 $a Salvatore, Anthony P., $e advisor
790 $a 0459
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1430949