東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Naturalistic versus direct phonologi...

Hoddy, Danielle Suzanne.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Naturalistic versus direct phonological treatment as a function of stimulability.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Naturalistic versus direct phonological treatment as a function of stimulability./
Author:	Hoddy, Danielle Suzanne.
Description:	68 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 34-06, page: 2368.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International34-06.
Subject:	Health Sciences, Speech Pathology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1380133

Naturalistic versus direct phonological treatment as a function of stimulability.
Hoddy, Danielle Suzanne.

Naturalistic versus direct phonological treatment as a function of stimulability. - 68 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 34-06, page: 2368.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Nevada, Reno, 1996.

Naturalistic and direct treatment procedures were used to treat phonological errors in an alternating treatment design. The target sounds consisted of both stimulable and non-stimulable inventory constraints. Subjects were four preschool-age children with moderate to severe phonological impairments. The four children each received both treatment procedures, naturalistic and direct, one type of treatment for each of two target sounds. Gains in accuracy of the target sounds were measured in untrained generalization probe words and training words. Although both treatments were effective, there was not one treatment procedure that could be identified as being more effective for stimulable or non-stimulable sounds across the four children.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018105
Health Sciences, Speech Pathology.

Naturalistic versus direct phonological treatment as a function of stimulability.
LDR:01558nmm 2200253 4500 001 1820718
005 20061114121306.5
008 130610s1996 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI1380133
035 $a AAI1380133
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Hoddy, Danielle Suzanne. $3 1909929
245 1 0 $a Naturalistic versus direct phonological treatment as a function of stimulability.
300 $a 68 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 34-06, page: 2368.
500 $a Advisor: Ann A. Tyler.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--University of Nevada, Reno, 1996.
520 $a Naturalistic and direct treatment procedures were used to treat phonological errors in an alternating treatment design. The target sounds consisted of both stimulable and non-stimulable inventory constraints. Subjects were four preschool-age children with moderate to severe phonological impairments. The four children each received both treatment procedures, naturalistic and direct, one type of treatment for each of two target sounds. Gains in accuracy of the target sounds were measured in untrained generalization probe words and training words. Although both treatments were effective, there was not one treatment procedure that could be identified as being more effective for stimulable or non-stimulable sounds across the four children.
590 $a School code: 0139.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Speech Pathology. $3 1018105
690 $a 0460
710 2 0 $a University of Nevada, Reno. $3 626634
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 34-06.
790 1 0 $a Tyler, Ann A., $e advisor
790 $a 0139
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 1996
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1380133