東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Reliabilty and validity of a compute...

Dong, Sandy Lyndon.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Reliabilty and validity of a computer-assisted emergency department triage system.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Reliabilty and validity of a computer-assisted emergency department triage system./
Author:	Dong, Sandy Lyndon.
Description:	102 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 44-03, page: 1348.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International44-03.
Subject:	Health Sciences, Public Health. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MR09151
ISBN:	0494091517

Reliabilty and validity of a computer-assisted emergency department triage system.
Dong, Sandy Lyndon.

Reliabilty and validity of a computer-assisted emergency department triage system. - 102 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 44-03, page: 1348.

Thesis (M.Sc.)--University of Alberta (Canada), 2005.

This research prospectively evaluated the performance of a computerized triage tool (eTRIAGE(c)) in an actual emergency department environment. There were several important conclusions from this research. First, a marked discrepancy was demonstrated between triage nurses using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) based on memory compared to eTRIAGE(c) (weighted kappa {kappaw}: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.42; n = 693). Second, eTRIAGE(c) demonstrated greater agreement with a consensus panel assigning triage (eTRIAGE (c) kappaw: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.56 vs. memory CTAS kappa w: 0.26; 95% CI 0:.13, 0.39; n = 97). Third, the agreement between two independent users of eTRIAGE(c) on the same patients improved to moderate or good (linear kappaw: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.57. quadratic kappaw: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.60--0.71; n = 569). Finally, higher acuity CTAS scores using eTRIAGE(c) were strongly associated with surrogate markers of patient acuity (admission rate [p<0.001)]; death [p<0.001]) and resource consumption (consultations [p<0.001], computed tomography scans [p<0.001], and length of stay [p<0.001]).

ISBN: 0494091517Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017659
Health Sciences, Public Health.

Reliabilty and validity of a computer-assisted emergency department triage system.
LDR:01938nmm 2200265 4500 001 1816119
005 20060717151156.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 0494091517
035 $a (UnM)AAIMR09151
035 $a AAIMR09151
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Dong, Sandy Lyndon. $3 1905514
245 1 0 $a Reliabilty and validity of a computer-assisted emergency department triage system.
300 $a 102 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 44-03, page: 1348.
502 $a Thesis (M.Sc.)--University of Alberta (Canada), 2005.
520 $a This research prospectively evaluated the performance of a computerized triage tool (eTRIAGE(c)) in an actual emergency department environment. There were several important conclusions from this research. First, a marked discrepancy was demonstrated between triage nurses using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) based on memory compared to eTRIAGE(c) (weighted kappa {kappaw}: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.42; n = 693). Second, eTRIAGE(c) demonstrated greater agreement with a consensus panel assigning triage (eTRIAGE (c) kappaw: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.56 vs. memory CTAS kappa w: 0.26; 95% CI 0:.13, 0.39; n = 97). Third, the agreement between two independent users of eTRIAGE(c) on the same patients improved to moderate or good (linear kappaw: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.57. quadratic kappaw: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.60--0.71; n = 569). Finally, higher acuity CTAS scores using eTRIAGE(c) were strongly associated with surrogate markers of patient acuity (admission rate [p<0.001)]; death [p<0.001]) and resource consumption (consultations [p<0.001], computed tomography scans [p<0.001], and length of stay [p<0.001]).
590 $a School code: 0351.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Public Health. $3 1017659
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery. $3 1017756
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Health Care Management. $3 1017922
690 $a 0573
690 $a 0564
690 $a 0769
710 2 0 $a University of Alberta (Canada). $3 626651
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 44-03.
790 $a 0351
791 $a M.Sc.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MR09151