東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The anonymous system: Anonymity and ...

Buurma, Rachel Sagner.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The anonymous system: Anonymity and corporate authority in nineteenth-century British literary culture (Edward Bulwer-Lytton, Charles Dickens, Anthony Trollope, Mary Elizabeth Hawker).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The anonymous system: Anonymity and corporate authority in nineteenth-century British literary culture (Edward Bulwer-Lytton, Charles Dickens, Anthony Trollope, Mary Elizabeth Hawker)./
作者:	Buurma, Rachel Sagner.
面頁冊數:	197 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 2226.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-06A.
標題:	Literature, English. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3179709
ISBN:	0542198517

The anonymous system: Anonymity and corporate authority in nineteenth-century British literary culture (Edward Bulwer-Lytton, Charles Dickens, Anthony Trollope, Mary Elizabeth Hawker).
Buurma, Rachel Sagner.

The anonymous system: Anonymity and corporate authority in nineteenth-century British literary culture (Edward Bulwer-Lytton, Charles Dickens, Anthony Trollope, Mary Elizabeth Hawker). - 197 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 2226.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2005.

This dissertation is about the Victorian debate over anonymous periodical publication and the literary and cultural significance of the concept of corporate authority central to it. The debate over whether periodical articles should be signed or anonymous stood out in Victorian discussions about the rapidly expanding world of print, and focused on the tension between individual and collective or corporate versions of authorship. In some cases, Victorian readers and writers saw periodical anonymity as simply hiding an individual author's name. More often, as Laurel Brake explains, these readers and writers understood that periodical anonymity "supported the corporate identity of the journal as a journal, and mitigated the differences of its individual contributors" (4). Absence of signature in periodicals was usually joined with the sustained use of the pronoun "we" to signify the text's collective or corporate voice; the phrase "'I' vs 'we'" became shorthand for the anonymity debates. Thus while many current critical accounts represent periodical anonymity as exclusively centered around a dynamic of the disclosure and secrecy of an individual author's name, I show that anonymity in Victorian literary culture as often signified a corporate literary authority unattached to a single body and not reducible to a single authorial consciousness. Victorian authorship, I further argue, was as often understood by readers and writers to be produced by the material practices of print culture as it was understood to be a function of individual authors' thoughts and intentions.

ISBN: 0542198517Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017709
Literature, English.

The anonymous system: Anonymity and corporate authority in nineteenth-century British literary culture (Edward Bulwer-Lytton, Charles Dickens, Anthony Trollope, Mary Elizabeth Hawker).
LDR:03356nmm 2200289 4500 001 1813512
005 20060503131730.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 0542198517
035 $a (UnM)AAI3179709
035 $a AAI3179709
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Buurma, Rachel Sagner. $3 1903012
245 1 4 $a The anonymous system: Anonymity and corporate authority in nineteenth-century British literary culture (Edward Bulwer-Lytton, Charles Dickens, Anthony Trollope, Mary Elizabeth Hawker).
300 $a 197 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 2226.
500 $a Advisers: Elaine Freedgood; Mary Poovey.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2005.
520 $a This dissertation is about the Victorian debate over anonymous periodical publication and the literary and cultural significance of the concept of corporate authority central to it. The debate over whether periodical articles should be signed or anonymous stood out in Victorian discussions about the rapidly expanding world of print, and focused on the tension between individual and collective or corporate versions of authorship. In some cases, Victorian readers and writers saw periodical anonymity as simply hiding an individual author's name. More often, as Laurel Brake explains, these readers and writers understood that periodical anonymity "supported the corporate identity of the journal as a journal, and mitigated the differences of its individual contributors" (4). Absence of signature in periodicals was usually joined with the sustained use of the pronoun "we" to signify the text's collective or corporate voice; the phrase "'I' vs 'we'" became shorthand for the anonymity debates. Thus while many current critical accounts represent periodical anonymity as exclusively centered around a dynamic of the disclosure and secrecy of an individual author's name, I show that anonymity in Victorian literary culture as often signified a corporate literary authority unattached to a single body and not reducible to a single authorial consciousness. Victorian authorship, I further argue, was as often understood by readers and writers to be produced by the material practices of print culture as it was understood to be a function of individual authors' thoughts and intentions.
520 $a Tracking the idea of corporate authority from the columns of magazines into the pages of novels, I explain that corporate authority was as essential a concept to readers of fictional narrative as it was to readers of periodicals. Interpreting novelistic narratives as employing both corporate and individual voices further reveals that these two different forms of literary authority were interdependent and mutually constitutive. Reading the work of authors including Edward Bulwer-Lytton, Charles Dickens, Anthony Trollope, and Mary Elizabeth Hawker in the context of the anonymity debates, I emphasize the importance of corporate authority to our ideas of both Victorian literary authority and novelistic narrative.
590 $a School code: 0175.
650 4 $a Literature, English. $3 1017709
690 $a 0593
710 2 0 $a University of Pennsylvania. $3 1017401
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-06A.
790 1 0 $a Freedgood, Elaine, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Poovey, Mary, $e advisor
790 $a 0175
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3179709