東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Integrated health systems and the im...

King, Mark T.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Integrated health systems and the impact on rural hospitals and communities.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Integrated health systems and the impact on rural hospitals and communities./
作者:	King, Mark T.
面頁冊數:	200 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: B, page: 1374.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-03B.
標題:	Health Sciences, Health Care Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3169764
ISBN:	0542058502

Integrated health systems and the impact on rural hospitals and communities.
King, Mark T.

Integrated health systems and the impact on rural hospitals and communities. - 200 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: B, page: 1374.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Oregon State University, 2005.

Purpose. Rural hospitals began to make significant changes in the 1990s by becoming integrated with larger health systems. The literature has correlated several key measures that determine the success of integrated health systems. These measures were quality, financial strength, community benefit, physician outcomes, and service changes. The purpose of this study is to determine if these same factors are applicable to rural hospitals that integrated in Oregon.

ISBN: 0542058502Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017922
Health Sciences, Health Care Management.

Integrated health systems and the impact on rural hospitals and communities.
LDR:03335nmm 2200313 4500 001 1812783
005 20060427132632.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 0542058502
035 $a (UnM)AAI3169764
035 $a AAI3169764
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a King, Mark T. $3 1902323
245 1 0 $a Integrated health systems and the impact on rural hospitals and communities.
300 $a 200 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: B, page: 1374.
500 $a Adviser: Leonard H. Friedman.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Oregon State University, 2005.
520 $a Purpose. Rural hospitals began to make significant changes in the 1990s by becoming integrated with larger health systems. The literature has correlated several key measures that determine the success of integrated health systems. These measures were quality, financial strength, community benefit, physician outcomes, and service changes. The purpose of this study is to determine if these same factors are applicable to rural hospitals that integrated in Oregon.
520 $a Methods. Introductory letters and surveys were sent to all rural hospital CEOs in the state (N = 38). Twenty hospital CEOs responded, nine rural integrated hospitals and eleven non-integrated hospitals. Financial data was gathered from the rural hospitals and from the State of Oregon. Qualitative data was gathered from individual telephone interviews with fifteen of the twenty CEOs. Two sample t-tests were conducted to compare integrated verses nonintegrated hospitals. The following data were reviewed: financial data (net income), community benefit data (charity care, Medicare and Medicaid write-offs), physician data (income changes, number of physicians), and service data (services added, types of services). Paired t-tests were used to compare pre- and post-integration hospitals.
520 $a Findings. The study found that there was greater percentage of charity care provided by integrated rural hospitals than non-integrated rural hospitals. It also found that there was a greater likelihood that integrated hospitals will add urgent care to its service mix after integration. The study found that emergency care physicians in non-integrated rural hospitals had greater income increases than in integrated hospitals. The study did not find there to be any difference in the net income, the Medicare/Medicaid write-offs, the services added, or the number of physicians added, between integrated and non-integrated hospitals. Data an quality measures were not available for comparative analysis.
520 $a Conclusions. There were not conclusive findings to say that integration has improved the financial performance, the community benefit, the physician access, or the services provided by rural hospitals in Oregon. Additional studies should concentrate on expanding the research to a regional or national level. Also, continuing to work with State and Federal agencies to develop consistent quality measures will benefit this research.
590 $a School code: 0172.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Health Care Management. $3 1017922
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Public Health. $3 1017659
690 $a 0769
690 $a 0573
710 2 0 $a Oregon State University. $3 625720
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-03B.
790 1 0 $a Friedman, Leonard H., $e advisor
790 $a 0172
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3169764