Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Sex differences in lateralization of...
~
Zimmer, Adam Todd.
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Sex differences in lateralization of attention functions.
Record Type:
Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Sex differences in lateralization of attention functions./
Author:
Zimmer, Adam Todd.
Description:
48 p.
Notes:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-04, page: 2498.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International48-04.
Subject:
Psychology, Psychobiology. -
Online resource:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1474718
ISBN:
9781109702101
Sex differences in lateralization of attention functions.
Zimmer, Adam Todd.
Sex differences in lateralization of attention functions.
- 48 p.
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-04, page: 2498.
Thesis (M.A.)--Western Carolina University, 2010.
Performance on two lateralized attention tasks, a unique, modified version of the Stroop task, and the Lateralized Attention Network Task, was investigated to add evidence to the topic of lateralized hemispheric strengths and weaknesses between the sexes. Sixty total participants at a mid-sized public university completed both tasks to obtain research credit for their classes. Results concluded that there were no significant differences between the sex of the participant and visual field in their efficiency in responding to the three metrics of the Lateralized Attention Network Task. Individual analysis of the six cue types showed some interactions between sex and visual field on response accuracy however, generally the results were not significant. Stroop task data analysis yielded no significant differences between sex and visual field in either Stroop effect or response accuracy. Overall, results were not consistent with our hypotheses. There was, however, a noticeable trend that males were likely to be more efficient at responding to the tasks when the stimuli were presented in the left visual field, as well as that women tended to perform more efficiently when the stimuli was presented in the right visual field. Although not a significant finding, the trend does add further evidence to the current belief that men respond better to items lateralized to the right hemisphere and that women respond better to items lateralized to the left hemisphere.
ISBN: 9781109702101Subjects--Topical Terms:
1017821
Psychology, Psychobiology.
Sex differences in lateralization of attention functions.
LDR
:02527nam 2200337 4500
001
1406053
005
20111213102421.5
008
130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781109702101
035
$a
(UMI)AAI1474718
035
$a
AAI1474718
040
$a
UMI
$c
UMI
100
1
$a
Zimmer, Adam Todd.
$3
1685486
245
1 0
$a
Sex differences in lateralization of attention functions.
300
$a
48 p.
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-04, page: 2498.
500
$a
Adviser: William D. Poynter.
502
$a
Thesis (M.A.)--Western Carolina University, 2010.
520
$a
Performance on two lateralized attention tasks, a unique, modified version of the Stroop task, and the Lateralized Attention Network Task, was investigated to add evidence to the topic of lateralized hemispheric strengths and weaknesses between the sexes. Sixty total participants at a mid-sized public university completed both tasks to obtain research credit for their classes. Results concluded that there were no significant differences between the sex of the participant and visual field in their efficiency in responding to the three metrics of the Lateralized Attention Network Task. Individual analysis of the six cue types showed some interactions between sex and visual field on response accuracy however, generally the results were not significant. Stroop task data analysis yielded no significant differences between sex and visual field in either Stroop effect or response accuracy. Overall, results were not consistent with our hypotheses. There was, however, a noticeable trend that males were likely to be more efficient at responding to the tasks when the stimuli were presented in the left visual field, as well as that women tended to perform more efficiently when the stimuli was presented in the right visual field. Although not a significant finding, the trend does add further evidence to the current belief that men respond better to items lateralized to the right hemisphere and that women respond better to items lateralized to the left hemisphere.
590
$a
School code: 1373.
650
4
$a
Psychology, Psychobiology.
$3
1017821
650
4
$a
Psychology, Clinical.
$3
524864
650
4
$a
Psychology, Experimental.
$3
517106
650
4
$a
Psychology, Cognitive.
$3
1017810
690
$a
0349
690
$a
0622
690
$a
0623
690
$a
0633
710
2
$a
Western Carolina University.
$b
Psychology.
$3
1029152
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
48-04.
790
1 0
$a
Poynter, William D.,
$e
advisor
790
1 0
$a
Poynter, William D.
$e
committee member
790
1 0
$a
Goodwin, C. James
$e
committee member
790
1 0
$a
McCord, David M.
$e
committee member
790
$a
1373
791
$a
M.A.
792
$a
2010
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1474718
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9169192
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login