Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
The role of the epistemic community ...
~
Richie, George E.
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
The role of the epistemic community in influencing privacy legislation: The United States and the European Union.
Record Type:
Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
The role of the epistemic community in influencing privacy legislation: The United States and the European Union./
Author:
Richie, George E.
Description:
301 p.
Notes:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-04, Section: A, page: 1434.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International72-04A.
Subject:
Political Science, International Relations. -
Online resource:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3443344
ISBN:
9781124481241
The role of the epistemic community in influencing privacy legislation: The United States and the European Union.
Richie, George E.
The role of the epistemic community in influencing privacy legislation: The United States and the European Union.
- 301 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-04, Section: A, page: 1434.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Denver, 2010.
Threats to individual privacy from computer information, database, and surveillance technologies of the mid-20th century prompted the formation of a privacy epistemic community that informed and influenced privacy policy and legislation in the United States and the European Union. Because the United States was more advanced in computer technology than the European nations, awareness of privacy issues, and the privacy epistemic community, emerged first in the United States---and migrated to Europe a generation later. The United States legislated the Privacy Act of 1974, which became the benchmark for individual privacy protection in the United States. While several European nations passed privacy legislation in the 1970s, there was no common privacy policy and law among European nations. In the early 1970s, the Council of Europe (CoE) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) created privacy data-protection committees that became important networking organizations for privacy epistemic community experts from the United States, European nations, and other OECD member nations. The influence of the trans-Atlantic privacy data-protection epistemic community can be seen in the similarities among the Fair Information Principles/Practices (FIP) found in privacy studies, guidelines, conventions, and laws in the U.S., the CoE, the OECD, and the European nations.
ISBN: 9781124481241Subjects--Topical Terms:
1669648
Political Science, International Relations.
The role of the epistemic community in influencing privacy legislation: The United States and the European Union.
LDR
:03570nam 2200325 4500
001
1404758
005
20111130125300.5
008
130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781124481241
035
$a
(UMI)AAI3443344
035
$a
AAI3443344
040
$a
UMI
$c
UMI
100
1
$a
Richie, George E.
$3
1684100
245
1 4
$a
The role of the epistemic community in influencing privacy legislation: The United States and the European Union.
300
$a
301 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-04, Section: A, page: 1434.
500
$a
Adviser: Joseph Szyliowicz.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Denver, 2010.
520
$a
Threats to individual privacy from computer information, database, and surveillance technologies of the mid-20th century prompted the formation of a privacy epistemic community that informed and influenced privacy policy and legislation in the United States and the European Union. Because the United States was more advanced in computer technology than the European nations, awareness of privacy issues, and the privacy epistemic community, emerged first in the United States---and migrated to Europe a generation later. The United States legislated the Privacy Act of 1974, which became the benchmark for individual privacy protection in the United States. While several European nations passed privacy legislation in the 1970s, there was no common privacy policy and law among European nations. In the early 1970s, the Council of Europe (CoE) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) created privacy data-protection committees that became important networking organizations for privacy epistemic community experts from the United States, European nations, and other OECD member nations. The influence of the trans-Atlantic privacy data-protection epistemic community can be seen in the similarities among the Fair Information Principles/Practices (FIP) found in privacy studies, guidelines, conventions, and laws in the U.S., the CoE, the OECD, and the European nations.
520
$a
Two case studies describe the role and influence of the privacy data-protection epistemic community members in influencing privacy studies, policy, and legislation in the United States and Europe. The United States enacted narrow "sectoral" legislation to protect individual privacy from government computers and databases in the Privacy Act of 1974. More than two decades later, the European Union enacted broad "omnibus" data-protection legislation that effectively limits the collection and aggregation of personal data on EU citizens. Why two such dramatically different privacy data-protection laws could have been enacted when influenced by the same privacy data-protection epistemic community leads to analysis of economic, socio-cultural, and political influences on privacy data-protection legislation. Evidence suggests that privacy data-protection epistemic community influence, filtered through different socio-cultural visions of the relationship of the government and the citizen, lead to dramatically different privacy data-protection legislative results.
590
$a
School code: 0061.
650
4
$a
Political Science, International Relations.
$3
1669648
650
4
$a
Political Science, General.
$3
1017391
690
$a
0601
690
$a
0615
710
2
$a
University of Denver.
$b
Josef Korbel School of International Studies.
$3
1020508
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
72-04A.
790
1 0
$a
Szyliowicz, Joseph,
$e
advisor
790
1 0
$a
Viotti, Paul R.
$e
committee member
790
1 0
$a
d'Estree, Claude P.
$e
committee member
790
1 0
$a
Reichman, Nancy
$e
committee member
790
$a
0061
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2010
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3443344
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9167897
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login