東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Creating deliberation in the context...

Vasilyeva, Alena L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Creating deliberation in the context of social conflict: The examination of mediator practices for shaping an interactivity in dispute mediation.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Creating deliberation in the context of social conflict: The examination of mediator practices for shaping an interactivity in dispute mediation./
作者:	Vasilyeva, Alena L.
面頁冊數:	354 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-03, Section: A, page: 0795.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-03A.
標題:	Speech Communication. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3434674
ISBN:	9781124418247

Creating deliberation in the context of social conflict: The examination of mediator practices for shaping an interactivity in dispute mediation.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.

Creating deliberation in the context of social conflict: The examination of mediator practices for shaping an interactivity in dispute mediation. - 354 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-03, Section: A, page: 0795.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2010.

The dissertation explored how deliberative activity is constructed within ongoing social conflict. The study examined mediator actions for keeping the disputants on task -- that is, on negotiating plans about caring for their children. This focus enabled an empirical investigation of three interrelated theoretical interests: (1) how an institutionally preferred form of interactivity is constructed in the ongoing course of interaction, (2) the role of the mediator as an ostensible designer of communication activity, and (3) the relationship between interaction and reasoning. An existing collection of 18 transcripts from audio recordings of mediation sessions at a mediation center in the western United States served as a source of interactional data. The participants of mediation sessions were eight mediators and 17 divorcing or divorced couples. The main focus of observation was on mediator communicative practices for keeping disputants on task. These were observed by attending to the word choices of mediators and their language actions evident across a corpus of transcripts. As the dialogue quality is a mutual achievement of all the participants, not just the mediator, the center of attention was also on different linguistic and interactional resources disputants provide in the course of interaction. The simple categories were useful for getting at higher order concepts such as topics and dialogue activities. There were four main findings from the empirical study. First, an institutionally preferred form of interactivity is constructed ongoing, often implicit, negotiation of what is on or off task through the uses of linguistic and interactional "materials" available in the moment to the participants. Second, mediators' uses of language to make references, establish topics, and launch dialogue activities are design moves that signal what is on-task and thus articulate the deliberative activity. Third, mediators construct their interventions in such a way as to balance concerns for face and the institutional goal for interaction. Fourth, argument and reasoning are constituted through interaction that imposes various constraints on what contributions are appropriate in mediation talk.

ISBN: 9781124418247Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017408
Speech Communication.

Creating deliberation in the context of social conflict: The examination of mediator practices for shaping an interactivity in dispute mediation.
LDR:03206nam 2200277 4500 001 1402919
005 20111103091528.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124418247
035 $a (UMI)AAI3434674
035 $a AAI3434674
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Vasilyeva, Alena L. $3 1682138
245 1 0 $a Creating deliberation in the context of social conflict: The examination of mediator practices for shaping an interactivity in dispute mediation.
300 $a 354 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-03, Section: A, page: 0795.
500 $a Adviser: Mark Aakhus.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2010.
520 $a The dissertation explored how deliberative activity is constructed within ongoing social conflict. The study examined mediator actions for keeping the disputants on task -- that is, on negotiating plans about caring for their children. This focus enabled an empirical investigation of three interrelated theoretical interests: (1) how an institutionally preferred form of interactivity is constructed in the ongoing course of interaction, (2) the role of the mediator as an ostensible designer of communication activity, and (3) the relationship between interaction and reasoning. An existing collection of 18 transcripts from audio recordings of mediation sessions at a mediation center in the western United States served as a source of interactional data. The participants of mediation sessions were eight mediators and 17 divorcing or divorced couples. The main focus of observation was on mediator communicative practices for keeping disputants on task. These were observed by attending to the word choices of mediators and their language actions evident across a corpus of transcripts. As the dialogue quality is a mutual achievement of all the participants, not just the mediator, the center of attention was also on different linguistic and interactional resources disputants provide in the course of interaction. The simple categories were useful for getting at higher order concepts such as topics and dialogue activities. There were four main findings from the empirical study. First, an institutionally preferred form of interactivity is constructed ongoing, often implicit, negotiation of what is on or off task through the uses of linguistic and interactional "materials" available in the moment to the participants. Second, mediators' uses of language to make references, establish topics, and launch dialogue activities are design moves that signal what is on-task and thus articulate the deliberative activity. Third, mediators construct their interventions in such a way as to balance concerns for face and the institutional goal for interaction. Fourth, argument and reasoning are constituted through interaction that imposes various constraints on what contributions are appropriate in mediation talk.
590 $a School code: 0190.
650 4 $a Speech Communication. $3 1017408
650 4 $a Alternative Dispute Resolution. $3 1674098
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0649
710 2 $a Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick. $b Graduate School - New Brunswick. $3 1019196
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-03A.
790 1 0 $a Aakhus, Mark, $e advisor
790 $a 0190
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3434674