東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Teams and stress: A meta-analysis an...

Brown, Brandy Allison.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Teams and stress: A meta-analysis and process analysis.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Teams and stress: A meta-analysis and process analysis./
Author:	Brown, Brandy Allison.
Description:	81 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-08, Section: B, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-08B.
Subject:	Business Administration, General. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3454904
ISBN:	9781124650173

Teams and stress: A meta-analysis and process analysis.
Brown, Brandy Allison.

Teams and stress: A meta-analysis and process analysis. - 81 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-08, Section: B, page: .

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Clemson University, 2011.

Past teamwork stress literature has experienced contradictory findings. As more reliable models of teamwork emerge, there is still a noticeable lack of information regarding how stress affects teamwork processes. This paper first reviews the current state of the team stress literature, where two types of stress for teams are explored: qualitative and quantitative stress. A meta-analysis examined the current literature on quantitative stress and the impact on team performance and effectiveness. Results from nine independent samples (N = 1,794) indicated that quantitative stress has a negative effect on team outcomes, r&d12; = -.41. Second, a lab study sought to discover if team processes predict performance under stress. Teams of two (N = 26) completed a process control simulation where workload was manipulated to create stress conditions. A multiple regression was conducted to explore if stress would moderate team processes, explaining the negative performance effects. The regression results showed that stress accounted for all the variance in performance, R2 = .83, p < .001. Exploratory analyses were conducted to support potential theoretical bases for these findings. The results provide strong support for a categorization of stress in teams (e.g. quantitative and qualitative stress) as well as evidence that team processes are not accurately self-reported in high quantitative stress conditions. This is an important observation for future teams research.

ISBN: 9781124650173Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017457
Business Administration, General.

Teams and stress: A meta-analysis and process analysis.
LDR:02531nam 2200325 4500 001 1402194
005 20111028105751.5
008 130515s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124650173
035 $a (UMI)AAI3454904
035 $a AAI3454904
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Brown, Brandy Allison. $3 1681355
245 1 0 $a Teams and stress: A meta-analysis and process analysis.
300 $a 81 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-08, Section: B, page: .
500 $a Adviser: Fred S. Switzer, III.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Clemson University, 2011.
520 $a Past teamwork stress literature has experienced contradictory findings. As more reliable models of teamwork emerge, there is still a noticeable lack of information regarding how stress affects teamwork processes. This paper first reviews the current state of the team stress literature, where two types of stress for teams are explored: qualitative and quantitative stress. A meta-analysis examined the current literature on quantitative stress and the impact on team performance and effectiveness. Results from nine independent samples (N = 1,794) indicated that quantitative stress has a negative effect on team outcomes, r&d12; = -.41. Second, a lab study sought to discover if team processes predict performance under stress. Teams of two (N = 26) completed a process control simulation where workload was manipulated to create stress conditions. A multiple regression was conducted to explore if stress would moderate team processes, explaining the negative performance effects. The regression results showed that stress accounted for all the variance in performance, R2 = .83, p < .001. Exploratory analyses were conducted to support potential theoretical bases for these findings. The results provide strong support for a categorization of stress in teams (e.g. quantitative and qualitative stress) as well as evidence that team processes are not accurately self-reported in high quantitative stress conditions. This is an important observation for future teams research.
590 $a School code: 0050.
650 4 $a Business Administration, General. $3 1017457
650 4 $a Psychology, Behavioral Sciences. $3 1669657
650 4 $a Psychology, Industrial. $3 520063
690 $a 0310
690 $a 0602
690 $a 0624
710 2 $a Clemson University. $b Psychology. $3 1057947
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-08B.
790 1 0 $a Switzer, Fred S., III, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Kowalski, Robin $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Pury, Cindy $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Rosopa, Patrick $e committee member
790 $a 0050
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2011
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3454904