東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Investigating whether a value-added ...

Oliver, Wendy L.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Investigating whether a value-added teaching effectiveness model designed for traditional classrooms can be used to measure online teaching quality.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Investigating whether a value-added teaching effectiveness model designed for traditional classrooms can be used to measure online teaching quality./
Author:	Oliver, Wendy L.
Description:	126 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-04, Section: A, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-04A.
Subject:	Education, Evaluation. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3439779
ISBN:	9781124455587

Investigating whether a value-added teaching effectiveness model designed for traditional classrooms can be used to measure online teaching quality.
Oliver, Wendy L.

Investigating whether a value-added teaching effectiveness model designed for traditional classrooms can be used to measure online teaching quality. - 126 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-04, Section: A, page: .

Thesis (Ed.D.)--The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, 2010.

The study reported here focused on assessing teacher quality in online environments. The purpose of the study was to explore the feasibility of using the same method Tennessee currently uses to gauge teaching quality of traditionally-delivered courses to determine teaching quality in the online environment. Research questions were: (1) Is there a significant difference in program effects of traditional classrooms (as measured by end-of-course scores for a sample of traditionally-taught students in a Tennessee school district) and online classrooms (as measured by end-of-course scores for a sample of Tennessee's online students)? (2) Do program effects between traditional and online environments vary significantly by subject area (i.e., Algebra I, Biology, and English 1)? (3) Do Tennessee educators perceive that Tennessee's model for teacher-effect scores can be used equally well in both traditional and online environments? (4) What factors and strategies do educators perceive should be considered in determining teaching quality in the traditional and online environments?

ISBN: 9781124455587Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669638
Education, Evaluation.

Investigating whether a value-added teaching effectiveness model designed for traditional classrooms can be used to measure online teaching quality.
LDR:03526nam 2200349 4500 001 1400952
005 20111018120958.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124455587
035 $a (UMI)AAI3439779
035 $a AAI3439779
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Oliver, Wendy L. $3 1680055
245 1 0 $a Investigating whether a value-added teaching effectiveness model designed for traditional classrooms can be used to measure online teaching quality.
300 $a 126 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-04, Section: A, page: .
500 $a Adviser: M. D. Roblyer.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, 2010.
520 $a The study reported here focused on assessing teacher quality in online environments. The purpose of the study was to explore the feasibility of using the same method Tennessee currently uses to gauge teaching quality of traditionally-delivered courses to determine teaching quality in the online environment. Research questions were: (1) Is there a significant difference in program effects of traditional classrooms (as measured by end-of-course scores for a sample of traditionally-taught students in a Tennessee school district) and online classrooms (as measured by end-of-course scores for a sample of Tennessee's online students)? (2) Do program effects between traditional and online environments vary significantly by subject area (i.e., Algebra I, Biology, and English 1)? (3) Do Tennessee educators perceive that Tennessee's model for teacher-effect scores can be used equally well in both traditional and online environments? (4) What factors and strategies do educators perceive should be considered in determining teaching quality in the traditional and online environments?
520 $a Research questions 1 and 2 were addressed by comparing EOC scores from students in each program. EOC scores from 162 students in a Tennessee online program were compared with a sample of 162 students from a Tennessee school district that were systematically selected to match the online sample in several important characteristics (e.g., socio-economic levels, indicators of prior achievement). A regression analysis was used to identify variables that contributed significantly to students' EOC scores, and effects of the two programs were compared by using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) to control for contributions of these variables. With these variables controlled, no significant differences existed between online and traditional programs in any content areas, except in Algebra I when only NCE scores were considered as a covariate.
520 $a To address research questions 3 and 4, 68 Tennessee educators completed a survey with open-ended and Likert-scale items. Survey data indicated a lack of understanding for Tennessee's teacher-effect model and a general perception that traditional teacher quality indicators cannot be used to assess teachers in the online environment. Implications of these findings and directions for future research are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0274.
650 4 $a Education, Evaluation. $3 1669638
650 4 $a Education, Teacher Training. $3 783747
650 4 $a Education, Technology of. $3 1018012
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0530
690 $a 0710
710 2 $a The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. $b Education. $3 1678768
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-04A.
790 1 0 $a Roblyer, M. D., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Bernard, Hindsdale $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Kelly, Kirk $e committee member
790 1 0 $a McAllister, Deborah $e committee member
790 $a 0274
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3439779