東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

North-South preferential trade agree...

Zappile, Tina M.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

North-South preferential trade agreements, trade, and armed conflict.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	North-South preferential trade agreements, trade, and armed conflict./
Author:	Zappile, Tina M.
Description:	179 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-05, Section: A, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-05A.
Subject:	Political Science, International Relations. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3444289
ISBN:	9781124516202

North-South preferential trade agreements, trade, and armed conflict.
Zappile, Tina M.

North-South preferential trade agreements, trade, and armed conflict. - 179 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-05, Section: A, page: .

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2011.

Do North-South preferential trade agreements (PTAs) hold promise for the expectation that increased economic interdependence contributes to more global peace? Contributing to the commercial institutional peace research, this dissertation calls into question the practice of treating North-South PTAs as similar to other agreements in assessing their effect on the relationship between trade and interstate armed conflict. The African Growth and Opportunity Act is used to develop and illustrate the following argument behind the contention that North-South nonreciprocal trade agreements are not expected to have a peaceful effect on their members. This type of trade agreement is unlikely to increase volumes of trade among its members, trade preferences incorporated in the agreement are often underutilized by less developed country members, providing few benefits to producers from less developed country member, these agreements do little to promise future expectations of gains from cooperation, and they have been recently used as political tools by developed country members. Results across two large-N logit models of dyadic data for years 1950-1985 and 1950-1999 suggest there is a significant difference between the effects of North-South PTAs versus other types of agreements on interstate armed conflict. In addition, North-South PTAs are found to have a null effect on interstate armed conflict, contrary to expectations put forth in the mainstream literature. Furthermore, membership in other types of trade agreements is found to have a positive effect on the probability of armed conflict, questioning the premise in the literature that preferential trade agreements pave the way for more peace.

ISBN: 9781124516202Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669648
Political Science, International Relations.

North-South preferential trade agreements, trade, and armed conflict.
LDR:02811nam 2200325 4500 001 1400566
005 20111010080630.5
008 130515s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124516202
035 $a (UMI)AAI3444289
035 $a AAI3444289
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Zappile, Tina M. $3 1679631
245 1 0 $a North-South preferential trade agreements, trade, and armed conflict.
300 $a 179 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-05, Section: A, page: .
500 $a Adviser: David P. Rapkin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2011.
520 $a Do North-South preferential trade agreements (PTAs) hold promise for the expectation that increased economic interdependence contributes to more global peace? Contributing to the commercial institutional peace research, this dissertation calls into question the practice of treating North-South PTAs as similar to other agreements in assessing their effect on the relationship between trade and interstate armed conflict. The African Growth and Opportunity Act is used to develop and illustrate the following argument behind the contention that North-South nonreciprocal trade agreements are not expected to have a peaceful effect on their members. This type of trade agreement is unlikely to increase volumes of trade among its members, trade preferences incorporated in the agreement are often underutilized by less developed country members, providing few benefits to producers from less developed country member, these agreements do little to promise future expectations of gains from cooperation, and they have been recently used as political tools by developed country members. Results across two large-N logit models of dyadic data for years 1950-1985 and 1950-1999 suggest there is a significant difference between the effects of North-South PTAs versus other types of agreements on interstate armed conflict. In addition, North-South PTAs are found to have a null effect on interstate armed conflict, contrary to expectations put forth in the mainstream literature. Furthermore, membership in other types of trade agreements is found to have a positive effect on the probability of armed conflict, questioning the premise in the literature that preferential trade agreements pave the way for more peace.
590 $a School code: 0138.
650 4 $a Political Science, International Relations. $3 1669648
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a The University of Nebraska - Lincoln. $b Political Science. $3 1677714
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-05A.
790 1 0 $a Rapkin, David P., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Strand, Jonathan R. $e committee member
790 1 0 $a McMahon, Patrice $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Miller, Ross $e committee member
790 1 0 $a van den Berg, Hendrik $e committee member
790 $a 0138
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2011
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3444289