Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Terror management theory: Interplay ...
~
Shatil, Sharon R.
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Terror management theory: Interplay between mortality salience, death-thoughts, and overall worldview defense.
Record Type:
Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Terror management theory: Interplay between mortality salience, death-thoughts, and overall worldview defense./
Author:
Shatil, Sharon R.
Description:
125 p.
Notes:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-07, Section: B, page: .
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International72-07B.
Subject:
Psychology, Social. -
Online resource:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3454288
ISBN:
9781124632858
Terror management theory: Interplay between mortality salience, death-thoughts, and overall worldview defense.
Shatil, Sharon R.
Terror management theory: Interplay between mortality salience, death-thoughts, and overall worldview defense.
- 125 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-07, Section: B, page: .
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Marquette University, 2012.
This study examines both the generalizability of Terror Management Theory (TMT) and the mechanisms by which individual difference variables work in the TMT model. A plethora of research exists to support TMT, a theory that explains much of human behavior as attempts to buffer the potential for anxiety provoked by being aware of one's own inevitable mortality (Pyszczynski et al., 2003). This dissertation investigated the generalizability of Terror Management Theory (TMT) and the mechanisms by which individual difference variables work in the TMT process. In order to do so, an operationalization of the variable "overall worldview" was provided. Participants consisted of 367 college students from the Psychology Department Experimental Subject Pool of a mid-sized Midwestern university. Subjects were quasi-randomly assigned to a 2 (mortality salience vs. control) x 2 (death-thought word stems vs. neutral word stems) between subjects design. Results suggested that humanists defended humanism more in the mortality salience condition than in the dental pain condition. However, mortality salience did not increase the defense of the normative worldview for normatives. Contrary to expectations, humanists and normatives defended their respective worldviews to an equivalent extent in the mortality salience condition. Mortality salience did not lead to defense of the American worldview for normatives or for humanists. Participants in the mortality salience condition, humanists, and normatives did not differ on the number of accessible death-thoughts in either the mortality salience or the dental pain condition. Despite methodological limitations, this study suggests that, at least for humanists, TMT does generalize beyond specific cultural worldviews to overall worldviews. It also indicates that the individual difference variables of being humanist/non-humanist and normative/non-normative do not affect the ability of mortality salience to prime death-thoughts. Rather, being humanist or non-humanist affects worldview defense after the death-thoughts have been primed and before distal defenses (i.e., worldview defense) are activated.
ISBN: 9781124632858Subjects--Topical Terms:
529430
Psychology, Social.
Terror management theory: Interplay between mortality salience, death-thoughts, and overall worldview defense.
LDR
:03260nam 2200325 4500
001
1399038
005
20110919095927.5
008
130515s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781124632858
035
$a
(UMI)AAI3454288
035
$a
AAI3454288
040
$a
UMI
$c
UMI
100
1
$a
Shatil, Sharon R.
$3
1677972
245
1 0
$a
Terror management theory: Interplay between mortality salience, death-thoughts, and overall worldview defense.
300
$a
125 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-07, Section: B, page: .
500
$a
Advisers: Matthew Sanders; Ed de St. Aubin.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Marquette University, 2012.
520
$a
This study examines both the generalizability of Terror Management Theory (TMT) and the mechanisms by which individual difference variables work in the TMT model. A plethora of research exists to support TMT, a theory that explains much of human behavior as attempts to buffer the potential for anxiety provoked by being aware of one's own inevitable mortality (Pyszczynski et al., 2003). This dissertation investigated the generalizability of Terror Management Theory (TMT) and the mechanisms by which individual difference variables work in the TMT process. In order to do so, an operationalization of the variable "overall worldview" was provided. Participants consisted of 367 college students from the Psychology Department Experimental Subject Pool of a mid-sized Midwestern university. Subjects were quasi-randomly assigned to a 2 (mortality salience vs. control) x 2 (death-thought word stems vs. neutral word stems) between subjects design. Results suggested that humanists defended humanism more in the mortality salience condition than in the dental pain condition. However, mortality salience did not increase the defense of the normative worldview for normatives. Contrary to expectations, humanists and normatives defended their respective worldviews to an equivalent extent in the mortality salience condition. Mortality salience did not lead to defense of the American worldview for normatives or for humanists. Participants in the mortality salience condition, humanists, and normatives did not differ on the number of accessible death-thoughts in either the mortality salience or the dental pain condition. Despite methodological limitations, this study suggests that, at least for humanists, TMT does generalize beyond specific cultural worldviews to overall worldviews. It also indicates that the individual difference variables of being humanist/non-humanist and normative/non-normative do not affect the ability of mortality salience to prime death-thoughts. Rather, being humanist or non-humanist affects worldview defense after the death-thoughts have been primed and before distal defenses (i.e., worldview defense) are activated.
590
$a
School code: 0116.
650
4
$a
Psychology, Social.
$3
529430
650
4
$a
Psychology, Clinical.
$3
524864
650
4
$a
Psychology, Personality.
$3
1017585
690
$a
0451
690
$a
0622
690
$a
0625
710
2
$a
Marquette University.
$b
Clinical Psychology.
$3
1677973
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
72-07B.
790
1 0
$a
Sanders, Matthew,
$e
advisor
790
1 0
$a
de St. Aubin, Ed,
$e
advisor
790
1 0
$a
Saunders, Stephen
$e
committee member
790
1 0
$a
Franzoi, Stephen
$e
committee member
790
$a
0116
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2012
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3454288
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9162177
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login