東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Comprehension and recall of figurati...

Biava, Christina Mary.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comprehension and recall of figurative language by nonnative speakers of English.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Comprehension and recall of figurative language by nonnative speakers of English./
作者:	Biava, Christina Mary.
面頁冊數:	173 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 52-11, Section: A, page: 3903.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International52-11A.
標題:	Education, Language and Literature. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9210744

Comprehension and recall of figurative language by nonnative speakers of English.
Biava, Christina Mary.

Comprehension and recall of figurative language by nonnative speakers of English. - 173 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 52-11, Section: A, page: 3903.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1991.

This study attempted to extend some of the findings in figurative language research over the past 10-15 years to a population not often tested in this area before, nonnative speakers of English. Most metaphor researchers in psycholinguistics have come to believe that nonliteral language is a vital component of language, not a "special" part that is acquired only after literal language has been acquired or that requires a different type of processing than literal language. The few studies done on nonnative speakers, on the other hand, concluded that figurative language was harder for these speakers, an aspect of the L2 that was to be avoided.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018115
Education, Language and Literature.

Comprehension and recall of figurative language by nonnative speakers of English.
LDR:02987nam 2200301 4500 001 1398277
005 20110908142944.5
008 130515s1991 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI9210744
035 $a AAI9210744
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Biava, Christina Mary. $3 1677157
245 1 0 $a Comprehension and recall of figurative language by nonnative speakers of English.
300 $a 173 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 52-11, Section: A, page: 3903.
500 $a Adviser: H. Maclay.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1991.
520 $a This study attempted to extend some of the findings in figurative language research over the past 10-15 years to a population not often tested in this area before, nonnative speakers of English. Most metaphor researchers in psycholinguistics have come to believe that nonliteral language is a vital component of language, not a "special" part that is acquired only after literal language has been acquired or that requires a different type of processing than literal language. The few studies done on nonnative speakers, on the other hand, concluded that figurative language was harder for these speakers, an aspect of the L2 that was to be avoided.
520 $a This study tested 124 international students in two intensive English programs in the spring of 1991. The study included two parts, a multiple-choice test of comprehension and a cued recall task. The three hypotheses that were tested in this study--that comprehension of literal and figurative items would be equal, that comprehension of metaphor and simile items would be equal, and that recall of literal and figurative items would be equal--were all supported, using ANOVA procedures. In the comprehension results, there was no statistically significant difference between literal and figurative items and metaphor and simile items. This held true, regardless of cultural background or English language proficiency. The third hypothesis was also supported in that figurative recall was not only as good as literal recall, but significantly better than it.
520 $a Thus, the results of this study, while supporting a decade of findings in psycholinguistic research on metaphor, make a somewhat counterclaim for second language researchers. However, it must be stressed that the handfull of figurative language studies using nonnative speakers are not exactly comparable. Many of those studies used highly conventionalized figurative language, such as idioms, while this study used novel metaphors. Also, most of those studies investigated production while comprehension and recall were the subject of the present study.
590 $a School code: 0090.
650 4 $a Education, Language and Literature. $3 1018115
650 4 $a Language, Linguistics. $3 1018079
650 4 $a Language, General. $3 1018089
690 $a 0279
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0679
710 2 $a University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. $3 626646
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 52-11A.
790 1 0 $a Maclay, H., $e advisor
790 $a 0090
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1991
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9210744