東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Do False Financial Statements Lead P...

Li, Yu.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Do False Financial Statements Lead Peer Firms to Make Distorted Decisions? An Analysis of Peer Firms' Real Operating Decisions during Periods of Misreporting.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Do False Financial Statements Lead Peer Firms to Make Distorted Decisions? An Analysis of Peer Firms' Real Operating Decisions during Periods of Misreporting./
Author:	Li, Yu.
Description:	63 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-12, Section: A, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-12A.
Subject:	Business Administration, Accounting. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3431672
ISBN:	9781124325484

Do False Financial Statements Lead Peer Firms to Make Distorted Decisions? An Analysis of Peer Firms' Real Operating Decisions during Periods of Misreporting.
Li, Yu.

Do False Financial Statements Lead Peer Firms to Make Distorted Decisions? An Analysis of Peer Firms' Real Operating Decisions during Periods of Misreporting. - 63 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-12, Section: A, page: .

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2010.

I investigate an externality of material financial misstatements by examining how these misstatements affect peer firms' real operating decisions during the periods of misreporting. I propose that a misreporting firm's peer firms will be misled by false accounting information and as a result will make unusual or distorted operating decisions. Using a sample of firms subject to SEC and DOJ enforcement actions for accounting misstatements as my misstating-firm sample, I find that peer firms of these misstating firms have unexpectedly high expenditures in fixed assets, R&D, and customer acquisition, but experience unexpectedly low gross profit in the misstatement period. The evidence is consistent with the notion that peer firms attempt to maintain or improve their product market performance rather than focus on short-term financial performance in the misstatement period. Finally, I find that the effect of misstatements on peer firms' operating decisions is negatively related to the relative size of peer firms to misstating firms.

ISBN: 9781124325484Subjects--Topical Terms:

1020666
Business Administration, Accounting.

Do False Financial Statements Lead Peer Firms to Make Distorted Decisions? An Analysis of Peer Firms' Real Operating Decisions during Periods of Misreporting.
LDR:02033nam 2200289 4500 001 1396183
005 20110531080618.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124325484
035 $a (UMI)AAI3431672
035 $a AAI3431672
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Li, Yu. $3 1263331
245 1 0 $a Do False Financial Statements Lead Peer Firms to Make Distorted Decisions? An Analysis of Peer Firms' Real Operating Decisions during Periods of Misreporting.
300 $a 63 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-12, Section: A, page: .
500 $a Adviser: Terrence Shevlin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2010.
520 $a I investigate an externality of material financial misstatements by examining how these misstatements affect peer firms' real operating decisions during the periods of misreporting. I propose that a misreporting firm's peer firms will be misled by false accounting information and as a result will make unusual or distorted operating decisions. Using a sample of firms subject to SEC and DOJ enforcement actions for accounting misstatements as my misstating-firm sample, I find that peer firms of these misstating firms have unexpectedly high expenditures in fixed assets, R&D, and customer acquisition, but experience unexpectedly low gross profit in the misstatement period. The evidence is consistent with the notion that peer firms attempt to maintain or improve their product market performance rather than focus on short-term financial performance in the misstatement period. Finally, I find that the effect of misstatements on peer firms' operating decisions is negatively related to the relative size of peer firms to misstating firms.
590 $a School code: 0250.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Accounting. $3 1020666
650 4 $a Business Administration, General. $3 1017457
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
690 $a 0272
690 $a 0310
690 $a 0454
710 2 $a University of Washington. $3 545923
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-12A.
790 1 0 $a Shevlin, Terrence, $e advisor
790 $a 0250
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3431672